These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37311866)

  • 21. Identification of careless responding in ecological momentary assessment research: From posthoc analyses to real-time data monitoring.
    Jaso BA; Kraus NI; Heller AS
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; 27(6):958-981. PubMed ID: 34582244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using a nonparametric item response theory model to identify patterns of cognitive decline: The Mokken scale analysis.
    Calderón C; Palominos D; Véliz-García Ó; Ramos-Henderson M; Bekios-Canales N; Beyle C; Ávalos-Tejeda M; Domic-Siede M
    J Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38934236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A change-point analysis procedure based on weighted residuals to detect back random responding.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):658-674. PubMed ID: 30762378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identifying careless responses in survey data.
    Meade AW; Craig SB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):437-55. PubMed ID: 22506584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Crit coefficient in Mokken scale analysis: a simulation study and an application in quality-of-life research.
    Crișan DR; Tendeiro JN; Meijer RR
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 34476671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Non-Parametric Item Response Theory Evaluation of the CAGE Instrument Among Older Adults.
    Abdin E; Sagayadevan V; Vaingankar JA; Picco L; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
    Subst Use Misuse; 2018 Feb; 53(3):391-399. PubMed ID: 28777686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in people who abuse heroin.
    Chiu EC; Hsueh IP; Hsieh CH; Hsieh CL
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2014 Apr; 113(4):234-41. PubMed ID: 24685299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accounting for careless and insufficient effort responding in large-scale survey data-development, evaluation, and application of a screen-time-based weighting procedure.
    Ulitzsch E; Shin HJ; Lüdtke O
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):804-825. PubMed ID: 36867339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Chinese version of the Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS): Mokken scaling.
    Watson R; Wang W; Ski CF; Thompson DR
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2012 Jan; 10():2. PubMed ID: 22221696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using heterogeneous sources of data and interpretability of prediction models to explain the characteristics of careless respondents in survey data.
    Kopitar L; Stiglic G
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13417. PubMed ID: 37591974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Item response theory evaluation of the biomedical scale of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale.
    Chiarotto A; Bishop A; Foster NE; Duncan K; Afolabi E; Ostelo RW; Paap MCS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202539. PubMed ID: 30208092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Preliminary testing using Mokken scaling of an Italian translation of the Edinburgh Feeding Evaluation in Dementia (EdFED-I) scale.
    Bagnasco A; Watson R; Zanini M; Rosa F; Rocco G; Sasso L
    Appl Nurs Res; 2015 Nov; 28(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 26608444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reversed item bias: an integrative model.
    Weijters B; Baumgartner H; Schillewaert N
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Sep; 18(3):320-34. PubMed ID: 23646990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring Within-Rater Category Ordering: A Simulation Study Using Adjacent-Categories Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA; Schumacker RE
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Oct; 78(5):887-904. PubMed ID: 32655174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An evaluation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire using Rasch analysis.
    Munyombwe T; Höfer S; Fitzsimons D; Thompson DR; Lane D; Smith K; Astin F
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Aug; 23(6):1753-65. PubMed ID: 24414195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adaptation of the Practice Environment Scale for military nurses: a psychometric analysis.
    Swiger PA; Raju D; Breckenridge-Sproat S; Patrician PA
    J Adv Nurs; 2017 Sep; 73(9):2219-2236. PubMed ID: 28181282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The attitudes to ageing questionnaire: Mokken scaling analysis.
    Shenkin SD; Watson R; Laidlaw K; Starr JM; Deary IJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99100. PubMed ID: 24892302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standard errors of two-level scalability coefficients.
    Koopman L; Zijlstra BJH; van der Ark LA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):213-236. PubMed ID: 31231795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validity Evidence of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) Part 2: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Test Content, Response Process, and Internal Structure in the Australian Community Health Setting.
    Cheng C; Elsworth GR; Osborne RH
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e32777. PubMed ID: 35258475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.