These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors. Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ikeda K; Ito M Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 21(11):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31199545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer. Melka D; Leiritz E; Labiad C; Blondeau M; Frontali A; Giacca M; Monsinjon M; Panis Y Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 24(5):587-593. PubMed ID: 35094470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. La Raja C; Foppa C; Maroli A; Kontovounisios C; Ben David N; Carvello M; Spinelli A Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Aug; 26(8):603-613. PubMed ID: 35344150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultralow Anterior Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: An Appraisal Based on Bowel Function. Cheong C; Oh SY; Choi SJ; Suh KW Dig Surg; 2019; 36(5):409-417. PubMed ID: 29990965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Efficacy of transanal hand-sewn reinforcement in low rectal stapled anastomosis in preventing anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision]. Jie HQ; Li Z; Luo SL; Liu ZZ; Zhang XW; Luan L; Liang WF; Hu HX; Kang L Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 24(6):530-535. PubMed ID: 34148318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis versus TaTME with immediate coloanal anastomosis and temporary diversion in middle and low rectal cancer. Madbouly KM; Emile SH; Gamal AA J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 125(5):865-871. PubMed ID: 35032329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer? Fischer A; Tarantino I; Warschkow R; Lange J; Zerz A; Hetzer FH Int J Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 25(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 20127342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cumulative incidence of permanent stoma after sphincter preserving low anterior resection of mid and low rectal cancer. Dinnewitzer A; Jäger T; Nawara C; Buchner S; Wolfgang H; Öfner D Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1134-42. PubMed ID: 24022530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer. Huh JW; Park YA; Sohn SK Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17525861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revised risk factors and patient characteristics for failure to close a defunctioning ileostomy following low anterior resection for locally advanced rectal cancer. Barenboim A; Geva R; Tulchinsky H Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 35705724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]