BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37311894)

  • 1. Modified pull-through coloanal anastomosis to avoid permanent stomas and reduce postoperative complications for lower rectal tumors.
    Mori S; Tanabe K; Wada M; Hamada Y; Yasudome R; Sonoda T; Matsushita D; Shimonosono M; Arigami T; Sasaki K; Kurahara H; Nakajo A; Ohtsuka T
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6569-6576. PubMed ID: 37311894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-Stage Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Biondo S; Trenti L; Espin E; Bianco F; Barrios O; Falato A; De Franciscis S; Solis A; Kreisler E;
    JAMA Surg; 2020 Aug; 155(8):e201625. PubMed ID: 32492131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors.
    Kitaguchi D; Nishizawa Y; Sasaki T; Tsukada Y; Ikeda K; Ito M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Nov; 21(11):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 31199545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed pull-through coloanal anastomosis without temporary stoma: an alternative to the standard manual side-to-end coloanal anastomosis with temporary stoma? A comparative study in 223 patients with low rectal cancer.
    Melka D; Leiritz E; Labiad C; Blondeau M; Frontali A; Giacca M; Monsinjon M; Panis Y
    Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 24(5):587-593. PubMed ID: 35094470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    La Raja C; Foppa C; Maroli A; Kontovounisios C; Ben David N; Carvello M; Spinelli A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Aug; 26(8):603-613. PubMed ID: 35344150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultralow Anterior Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: An Appraisal Based on Bowel Function.
    Cheong C; Oh SY; Choi SJ; Suh KW
    Dig Surg; 2019; 36(5):409-417. PubMed ID: 29990965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative Incidence and Risk Factors of Permanent Stoma After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
    Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Gao DW; Zhu J; Ding JH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Jan; 65(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 34882629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic delayed coloanal anastomosis without diverting ileostomy for low rectal cancer surgery: 85 consecutive patients from a single institution.
    Sage PY; Trilling B; Waroquet PA; Voirin D; Girard E; Faucheron JL
    Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Jul; 22(7):511-518. PubMed ID: 30027493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).
    Biondo S; Trenti L; Galvez A; Espin-Basany E; Bianco F; Romano G; Kreisler E;
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1357-1362. PubMed ID: 28667499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of stapled and manual coloanal anastomosis.
    Cong JC; Chen CS; Ma MX; Xia ZX; Liu DS; Zhang FY
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 May; 16(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 24460588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
    Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Efficacy of transanal hand-sewn reinforcement in low rectal stapled anastomosis in preventing anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision].
    Jie HQ; Li Z; Luo SL; Liu ZZ; Zhang XW; Luan L; Liang WF; Hu HX; Kang L
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 24(6):530-535. PubMed ID: 34148318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) with delayed coloanal anastomosis versus TaTME with immediate coloanal anastomosis and temporary diversion in middle and low rectal cancer.
    Madbouly KM; Emile SH; Gamal AA
    J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 125(5):865-871. PubMed ID: 35032329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is sphincter preservation reasonable in all patients with rectal cancer?
    Fischer A; Tarantino I; Warschkow R; Lange J; Zerz A; Hetzer FH
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 25(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 20127342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cumulative incidence of permanent stoma after sphincter preserving low anterior resection of mid and low rectal cancer.
    Dinnewitzer A; Jäger T; Nawara C; Buchner S; Wolfgang H; Öfner D
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1134-42. PubMed ID: 24022530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A diverting stoma is not necessary when performing a handsewn coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer.
    Huh JW; Park YA; Sohn SK
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Jul; 50(7):1040-6. PubMed ID: 17525861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revised risk factors and patient characteristics for failure to close a defunctioning ileostomy following low anterior resection for locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Barenboim A; Geva R; Tulchinsky H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 35705724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer.
    Lee SY; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):660-666. PubMed ID: 28726144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.
    Räsänen M; Renkonen-Sinisalo L; Carpelan-Holmström M; Lepistö A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1323-8. PubMed ID: 26111635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Risk factors and clinical features of delayed anastomotic fistula following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer].
    Huang S; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Huang Y; Jiang W; Xu Z; Sun Y; Ye D; Wang X
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 19(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 27112470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.