These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37312832)

  • 21. In vitro wear of flowable resin composite for posterior restorations.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Suzuki M
    Dent Mater J; 2016; 35(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 26843441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of occlusal wear between bulk-fill and conventional flowable resin composites.
    Ujiie M; Tsujimoto A; Barkmeier WW; Jurado CA; Villalobos-Tinoco J; Takamizawa T; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Am J Dent; 2020 Apr; 33(2):74-78. PubMed ID: 32259411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.
    Korkmaz Y; Ozel E; Attar N
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Apr; 9(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 17489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of three kinds of new composite resins].
    Wang LK; Shi LS; Zhu HS
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 18357875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interrelation among the handling, mechanical, and wear properties of the newly developed flowable resin composites.
    Imai A; Takamizawa T; Sugimura R; Tsujimoto A; Ishii R; Kawazu M; Saito T; Miyazaki M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Jan; 89():72-80. PubMed ID: 30265868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fissure sealant materials: Wear resistance of flowable composite resins.
    Asefi S; Eskandarion S; Hamidiaval S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2016; 10(3):194-9. PubMed ID: 27651887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
    Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Depth of Cure, Hardness, Roughness and Filler Dimension of Bulk-Fill Flowable, Conventional Flowable and High-Strength Universal Injectable Composites: An In Vitro Study.
    Ludovichetti FS; Lucchi P; Zambon G; Pezzato L; Bertolini R; Zerman N; Stellini E; Mazzoleni S
    Nanomaterials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 35745293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness of tooth-colored materials.
    Celik C; Ozgünaltay G
    Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 19862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite.
    Rengo C; Goracci C; Juloski J; Chieffi N; Giovannetti A; Vichi A; Ferrari M
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Jun; 57(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 22624765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of filler size and filler loading on wear of experimental flowable resin composites.
    Shinkai K; Taira Y; Suzuki S; Kawashima S; Suzuki M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018 Feb; 26():e20160652. PubMed ID: 29412366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite, Conventional Flowable Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement to Primary Dentin.
    Poorzandpoush K; Shahrabi M; Heidari A; Hosseinipour ZS
    Front Dent; 2019; 16(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 31608338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The frictional coefficients and associated wear resistance of novel low-shrink resin-based composites.
    Palin WM; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ; Marquis PM; Pintado MR; Randall RC; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1111-8. PubMed ID: 16085304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterization of third-body media particles and their effect on in vitro composite wear.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Beck P; Litaker MS; Burgess JO
    Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):e118-26. PubMed ID: 22578990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of two-body wear.
    Lazaridou D; Belli R; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1485-92. PubMed ID: 25491442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner.
    Efes BG; Dörter C; Gömeç Y; Koray F
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr; 8(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 16708724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does a Self-adhesive Flowable Resin Composite Perform Similarly to Highly Filled and Conventional Flowable Resin Composites in Occlusal Cavities? A 2-year Follow-up Study.
    Oz FD; Meral E; Gurgan S
    J Adhes Dent; 2021 Dec; 23(6):497-503. PubMed ID: 34817965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites.
    Leprince JG; Palin WM; Vanacker J; Sabbagh J; Devaux J; Leloup G
    J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):993-1000. PubMed ID: 24874951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of the wear behavior of composites for posterior restorations.
    Turssi CP; Faraoni-Romano JJ; de Menezes M; Serra MC
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Jan; 18(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 17200825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.