110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37313962)
1. Comparing Aerosol Generation in Human and Animal Tissues During Common Otolaryngology Procedures.
Nielson C; Kelly K; Attah R; Pei Z; Wang Y; Firpo MA; Park AH
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Dec; 169(6):1491-1498. PubMed ID: 37313962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Airborne Aerosolized Mouse Cytomegalovirus From Common Otolaryngology Procedures: Implications for COVID-19 Infection.
Sayahi T; Nielson C; Yu Y; Neuberger K; Seipp M; Firpo MA; Kelly K; Park AH
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 164(3):547-555. PubMed ID: 32928037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance Comparison of Field Portable Instruments to the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Using Monodispersed and Polydispersed Sodium Chloride Aerosols.
Vo E; Horvatin M; Zhuang Z
Ann Work Expo Health; 2018 Jul; 62(6):711-720. PubMed ID: 29788040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of surgical techniques in times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: electrocautery generates more droplets and aerosol than laser surgery or drilling.
Guderian DB; Loth AG; Weiß R; Diensthuber M; Stöver T; Leinung M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 278(4):1237-1245. PubMed ID: 32895799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Airborne Aerosol Generation During Endonasal Procedures in the Era of COVID-19: Risks and Recommendations.
Workman AD; Jafari A; Welling DB; Varvares MA; Gray ST; Holbrook EH; Scangas GA; Xiao R; Carter BS; Curry WT; Bleier BS
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Sep; 163(3):465-470. PubMed ID: 32452739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aerosol Concentrations During Otolaryngology Procedures in a Negative Pressure Isolation Room.
Seresirikachorn K; Sirinara P; Tangjaturonrasme N; Panyametheekul S; Ngamsritrakul T; Supaphan U; Boonroung T; Ongphichetmetha N; Koosrivinij S; Snidvongs K
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 May; 168(5):1015-1024. PubMed ID: 36876516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between two different nanoparticle size spectrometers.
Belosi F; Ferrari S; Poluzzi V; Santachiara G; Prodi F
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Aug; 63(8):918-25. PubMed ID: 24010372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metrological assessment of a portable analyzer for monitoring the particle size distribution of ultrafine particles.
Stabile L; Cauda E; Marini S; Buonanno G
Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Aug; 58(7):860-76. PubMed ID: 24817159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 portable aerosol spectrometer to the TSI 3321 aerodynamic particle sizer for dry particles.
Peters TM; Ott D; O'Shaughnessy PT
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Nov; 50(8):843-50. PubMed ID: 17041244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of Experimental and Clinical Bioaerosol Generation During Potential Aerosol-Generating Procedures.
Doggett N; Chow CW; Mubareka S
Chest; 2020 Dec; 158(6):2467-2473. PubMed ID: 32707180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nasal endoscopy, room filtration, and aerosol concentrations during live outpatient encounters: a prospective, case-control study.
Gill AS; Kaur K; Shipman P; Sumsion J; Error M; Kelly K; Alt JA
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2022 Jan; 12(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 34355871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance evaluation of newly developed portable aerosol sizers used for nanomaterial aerosol measurements.
Yamada M; Takaya M; Ogura I
Ind Health; 2015; 53(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 26320727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aerosol Generation During Otologic Surgery.
Lahelma M; Oksanen L; Rantanen N; Sinkkonen S; Aarnisalo A; Geneid A; Sanmark E
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep; 43(8):924-930. PubMed ID: 35900917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Real-time characterization of chemical threat agent aerosols for improvement of inhalation studies.
de Bruin-Hoegée M; Alkema DPW; Busker RW; Joosen MJA; van Wuijckhuijse AL
Inhal Toxicol; 2023; 35(9-10):254-265. PubMed ID: 37729079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel Use of Vitamin B2 as a Fluorescent Tracer in Aerosol and Droplet Contamination Models in Otolaryngology.
Sim ES; Dharmarajan H; Boorgu DSSK; Goyal L; Weinstock M; Whelan R; Freiser ME; Corcoran TE; Jabbour N; Wang E; Chi DH
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Mar; 130(3):280-285. PubMed ID: 32795090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the DiSCmini aerosol monitor to a handheld condensation particle counter and a scanning mobility particle sizer for submicrometer sodium chloride and metal aerosols.
Mills JB; Park JH; Peters TM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(5):250-8. PubMed ID: 23473056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aerosol generation during general anesthesia is comparable to coughing: An observational clinical study.
Oksanen LM; Sanmark E; Sofieva S; Rantanen N; Lahelma M; Anttila VJ; Lehtonen L; Atanasova N; Pesonen E; Geneid A; Hyvärinen AP
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2022 Apr; 66(4):463-472. PubMed ID: 34951703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rhinological procedures result in minimal generation of aerosols.
Sanmark E; Oksanen LAH; Rantanen N; Virkkula P; Geneid A
Rhinology; 2023 Apr; 61(2):170-179. PubMed ID: 36752359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures.
Dudding T; Sheikh S; Gregson F; Haworth J; Haworth S; Main BG; Shrimpton AJ; Hamilton FW; ; Ireland AJ; Maskell NA; Reid JP; Bzdek BR; Gormley M
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265076. PubMed ID: 35271682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
