These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37314046)

  • 21. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?
    Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study.
    Imburgia M; Logozzo S; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Mangano C; Mangano FG
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Jun; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28577366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.
    Motel C; Kirchner E; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 31802574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
    Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting.
    Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of implant impression techniques with a scannable healing abutment.
    Jung HT; Kim HY; Song SY; Park JH; Lee JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):729-734. PubMed ID: 33832762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 22(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32643259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reproducibility of laboratory scanning of multiple implants in complete edentulous arch: Effect of scan bodies.
    Pan Y; Tam JMY; Tsoi JKH; Lam WYH; Pow EHN
    J Dent; 2020 May; 96():103329. PubMed ID: 32251696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving intraoral implant scanning with a novel auxiliary device: An in-vitro study.
    Pan Y; Tsoi JKH; Lam WY; Zhao K; Pow EH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 34545614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of customized over-scan body rings on the intraoral scanning effectiveness of a multiple implant edentulous mandibular model.
    García-Martínez I; Zarauz C; Morejón B; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104095. PubMed ID: 35301081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae.
    Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P; Tsigarida A; Romeo D; Chen YW; Natto Z; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 32166793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictability of intraoral scanner error for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation.
    Zingari F; Meglioli M; Gallo F; Macaluso GM; Tagliaferri S; Toffoli A; Ghezzi B; Lumetti S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3895-3905. PubMed ID: 37041271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study.
    Retana L; Nejat AH; Pozzi A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Feb; 26(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 35072425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.
    Huang R; Liu Y; Huang B; Zhou F; Chen Z; Li Z
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):623. PubMed ID: 34876122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed prosthesis: An in vitro study.
    Kosago P; Ungurawasaporn C; Kukiattrakoon B
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):616-624. PubMed ID: 36083233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.