125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37315543)
1. Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation Using FLEX26 Electrode: Audiological Results and Quality of Life after 12 Months.
Skarzynski PH; Lorens A; Gos E; Kolodziejak A; Obrycka A; Skarżyńska MB; Czajka N; Porowski M; Skarzynski H
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):458-465. PubMed ID: 37315543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With Standard Length Electrodes in Adult Cochlear Implantation and the Uptake of Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Harrison L; Manjaly JG; Ellis W; Lavy JA; Shaida A; Khalil SS; Saeed SR
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Sep; 41(8):1060-1065. PubMed ID: 32569131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation of Scalar Cochlear Volume and Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing.
Räth M; Schurzig D; Timm ME; Lenarz T; Warnecke A
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):256-265. PubMed ID: 38361293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear function following implantation with a full electrode array.
Obholzer RJ; Gibson WP
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 21756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Residual Hearing Outcomes After Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Ultra-flexible 28-mm Electrodes.
Kisser U; Wünsch J; Hempel JM; Adderson-Kisser C; Stelter K; Krause E; Müller J; Schrötzlmair F
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Aug; 37(7):878-81. PubMed ID: 27243337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With a Mid-Scala Electrode in Cochlear Implantation.
Hunter JB; Gifford RH; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Bennett ML; Haynes DS; Rivas A
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Mar; 37(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 26825671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hearing preservation after cochlear implantation using deeply inserted flex atraumatic electrode arrays.
Tamir S; Ferrary E; Borel S; Sterkers O; Bozorg Grayeli A
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22813984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Residual hearing in cochlear implant patients.
Di Nardo W; Cantore I; Melillo P; Cianfrone F; Scorpecci A; Paludetti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 264(8):855-60. PubMed ID: 17333229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing Preservation With the Use of Flex20 and Flex24 Electrodes in Patients With Partial Deafness.
Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H; Dziendziel B; Rajchel JJ; Gos E; Lorens A
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):1153-1159. PubMed ID: 31318788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.
Mamelle E; Granger B; Sterkers O; Lahlou G; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y; Mosnier I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 277(3):705-713. PubMed ID: 31802226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing preservation in children with electric-acoustic stimulation after cochlear implantation : Outcome after electrode insertion with minimal insertion trauma.
Rader T; Bohnert A; Matthias C; Koutsimpelas D; Kainz MA; Strieth S
HNO; 2018 Jul; 66(Suppl 2):56-62. PubMed ID: 30132125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Natural course of residual hearing preservation with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.
Lee SY; Jeon H; Kim Y; Choi HY; Carandang M; Yoo HS; Choi BY
Am J Otolaryngol; 2022; 43(2):103382. PubMed ID: 35151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing preservation and hearing improvement after reimplantation of pediatric and adult patients with partial deafness: a retrospective case series review.
Jayawardena J; Kuthubutheen J; Rajan G
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):740-4. PubMed ID: 22699985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
