186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37316579)
1. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI estimation of vascular parameters using knowledge-based adaptive models.
Bagher-Ebadian H; Brown SL; Ghassemi MM; Nagaraja TN; Valadie OG; Acharya PC; Cabral G; Divine G; Knight RA; Lee IY; Xu JH; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Ewing JR
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9672. PubMed ID: 37316579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the Reliability of Pharmacokinetic Parameters at Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Astrocytomas: A Deep Learning Approach.
Choi KS; You SH; Han Y; Ye JC; Jeong B; Choi SH
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):178-188. PubMed ID: 32749203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiomics characterization of tissues in an animal brain tumor model imaged using dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.
Bagher-Ebadian H; Brown SL; Ghassemi MM; Nagaraja TN; Movsas B; Ewing JR; Chetty IJ
Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):10693. PubMed ID: 37394559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Kinahan PE; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30854447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DCE-MRI prediction of survival time for patients with glioblastoma multiforme: using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy-based model and nested model selection technique.
Dehkordi ANV; Kamali-Asl A; Wen N; Mikkelsen T; Chetty IJ; Bagher-Ebadian H
NMR Biomed; 2017 Sep; 30(9):. PubMed ID: 28543885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.
Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An extended vascular model for less biased estimation of permeability parameters in DCE-T1 images.
Nejad-Davarani SP; Bagher-Ebadian H; Ewing JR; Noll DC; Mikkelsen T; Chopp M; Jiang Q
NMR Biomed; 2017 Jun; 30(6):. PubMed ID: 28211961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vessel wall and adventitial DCE-MRI parameters demonstrate similar correlations with carotid plaque microvasculature on histology.
van Hoof RHM; Vöö SA; Sluimer JC; Wijnen NJA; Hermeling E; Schreuder FHBM; Truijman MTB; Cleutjens JPM; Daemen MJAP; Daemen JH; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Mess WH; Wildberger JE; Heeneman S; Kooi ME
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1053-1059. PubMed ID: 28152245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer.
Sun H; Xu Y; Xu Q; Duan J; Zhang H; Liu T; Li L; Chan Q; Xie S; Wang W
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):e134-e140. PubMed ID: 30268719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
