These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3731706)

  • 1. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Omnipaque and urografin in arthrography of the knee.
    Farsø Nielsen F; de Carvalho A; Hjøllund Madsen E
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 6731021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast media for CT. An analysis of the early pharmacokinetics.
    Jensen LI; Dean PB; Nyman U; Golman K
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Nov; 20(8):867-70. PubMed ID: 4077440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
    Ahlgren P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Omnipaque and Urografin in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. A randomised, double blind study.
    Folke K; Andrew E; Laulund S; Hansen PF
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):319-23. PubMed ID: 3904899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Physiological effect of contrast media on the urinary tract and the problems of interpretation of excretory urograms].
    Bosin VIu; Skripkina LA
    Ter Arkh; 1980; 52(7):88-91. PubMed ID: 7404421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iohexol compared with diatrizoate in pediatric urography.
    Jorulf H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():42-5. PubMed ID: 6591740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tissue fluid shifts during renal arteriography with conventional and low osmolality agents.
    Morris TW; Harnish PP; Reece K; Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 6618823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol.
    Cacayorin ED; Bernstein AD; Fruehan CT; Lee SH; Kieffer SA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 6410736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of urograms in infants: a comparison of sodium diatrizoate, metrizamide and iohexol.
    Rawlinson J; Hyde I; Williams J
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jul; 61(727):592-5. PubMed ID: 3408847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.