These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37318596)

  • 1. Response uncertainty influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2024 Feb; 88(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 37318596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual decoupling or trigger happiness: the effect of response delays and shorter presentation times on a go-no-go task with a high go prevalence.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Apr; 242(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 38448673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Go-stimuli probability influences response bias in the sustained attention to response task: a signal detection theory perspective.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2023 Mar; 87(2):509-518. PubMed ID: 35403969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliable- and unreliable-warning cues in the Sustained Attention to Response Task.
    Helton WS; Head J; Russell PN
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 209(3):401-7. PubMed ID: 21287153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual decoupling in the sustained attention to response task is unlikely.
    Bedi A; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Aug; 242(8):2033-2040. PubMed ID: 38958722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Go-stimuli proportion influences response strategy in a sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; Finkbeiner KM; de Joux NR; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2989-98. PubMed ID: 27329605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of real-time performance feedback and performance emphasis on the sustained attention to response task (SART).
    Mensen JM; Dang JS; Stets AJ; Helton WS
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1972-1979. PubMed ID: 34623490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prolonging the Response Movement Reduces Commission Errors in a High-Go, Low-No-Go Target Detection Task and Composite Metrics of Performance Miss This Effect.
    Mensen JM; Holland SB; Helton WS; Shaw TH; Peterson MS
    Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):1118-1131. PubMed ID: 36124873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention.
    Helton WS; Russell PN
    Psychol Res; 2011 Sep; 75(5):384-92. PubMed ID: 21103888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conscious thought and the sustained attention to response task.
    Helton WS; Kern RP; Walker DR
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):600-7. PubMed ID: 19589699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. You are measuring the decision to be fast, not inattention: the Sustained Attention to Response Task does not measure sustained attention.
    Dang JS; Figueroa IJ; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Aug; 236(8):2255-2262. PubMed ID: 29846798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prolonging the response movement inhibits the feed-forward motor program in the sustained attention to response task.
    Wilson KM; de Joux NR; Finkbeiner KM; Russell PN; Retzler JR; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():75-84. PubMed ID: 29351864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quick and the dead: A paradigm for studying friendly fire.
    Munnik A; Näswall K; Woodward G; Helton WS
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Apr; 84():103032. PubMed ID: 31987515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual decoupling or motor decoupling?
    Head J; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):913-9. PubMed ID: 23838467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition.
    Carter L; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 23501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of warning cues and attention-capturing stimuli on the sustained attention to response task.
    Finkbeiner KM; Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Apr; 233(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25537468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():87-94. PubMed ID: 25310454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice does not make perfect in a modified sustained attention to response task.
    Head J; Helton WS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Feb; 232(2):565-73. PubMed ID: 24247591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spider stimuli improve response inhibition.
    Wilson KM; Russell PN; Helton WS
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 May; 33():406-13. PubMed ID: 25770464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.