127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37318651)
1. Performance-based protocol for selection of economical portable sensor for air quality measurement.
Shukla N; Gulia S; Goyal P; Dey S; Bosu P; Goyal SK
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):845. PubMed ID: 37318651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.
Carvlin GN; Lugo H; Olmedo L; Bejarano E; Wilkie A; Meltzer D; Wong M; King G; Northcross A; Jerrett M; English PB; Hammond D; Seto E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1342-1352. PubMed ID: 28829718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A feasible experimental framework for field calibration of portable light-scattering aerosol monitors: Case of TSI DustTrak.
Li Z; Che W; Lau AKH; Fung JCH; Lin C; Lu X
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113136. PubMed ID: 31522000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities-a case study in Sheffield.
Munir S; Mayfield M; Coca D; Jubb SA; Osammor O
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):94. PubMed ID: 30671683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two step calibration method for ozone low-cost sensor: Field experiences with the UrbanSense DCUs.
Sá JP; Chojer H; Branco PTBS; Alvim-Ferraz MCM; Martins FG; Sousa SIV
J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116910. PubMed ID: 36495826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The improvement of spatial-temporal resolution of PM
Lin YC; Chi WJ; Lin YQ
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105305. PubMed ID: 31739136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter.
Aix ML; Schmitz S; Bicout DJ
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 889():164063. PubMed ID: 37201842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitors in Dallas, Texas.
Khreis H; Johnson J; Jack K; Dadashova B; Park ES
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-Resolution Urban Air Quality Mapping for Multiple Pollutants Based on Dense Monitoring Data and Machine Learning.
Guo R; Qi Y; Zhao B; Pei Z; Wen F; Wu S; Zhang Q
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-Cost CO Sensor Calibration Using One Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.
Ali S; Alam F; Arif KM; Potgieter J
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Data-Driven Techniques for Low-Cost Sensor Selection and Calibration for the Use Case of Air Quality Monitoring.
Kureshi RR; Mishra BK; Thakker D; John R; Walker A; Simpson S; Thakkar N; Wante AK
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-Cost Sensor Node for Air Quality Monitoring: Field Tests and Validation of Particulate Matter Measurements.
Schilt U; Barahona B; Buck R; Meyer P; Kappani P; Möckli Y; Meyer M; Schuetz P
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal and spatial statistical analysis of ambient air quality of Assam (India).
Bhunia GS; Ding D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Aug; 70(8):775-794. PubMed ID: 32442037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anomaly Detection and Repairing for Improving Air Quality Monitoring.
Rollo F; Bachechi C; Po L
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36679439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meteorology drives ambient air quality in a valley: a case of Sukinda chromite mine, one among the ten most polluted areas in the world.
Mishra SR; Pradhan RP; Prusty BA; Sahu SK
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jul; 188(7):402. PubMed ID: 27289470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Approximation for Metal-Oxide Sensor Calibration for Air Quality Monitoring Using Multivariable Statistical Analysis.
Sales-Lérida D; Bello AJ; Sánchez-Alzola A; Martínez-Jiménez PM
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(14):. PubMed ID: 34300517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of urban air monitoring with high spatial resolution using mobile vehicle sensors.
Yeom K
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(6):375. PubMed ID: 34061237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
