These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37318809)

  • 1. Focusing on Decisions, Outcomes, and Value Judgments to Confront Algorithmic Bias.
    Pandya A; Zhu J
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jun; 6(6):e2318501. PubMed ID: 37318809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social bias insights concern judgments rather than real-world decisions.
    Białek M; Grossmann I
    Behav Brain Sci; 2022 May; 45():e68. PubMed ID: 35550216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual and Cognitive Judgments Show Both Anchoring and Repulsion.
    Spicer J; Zhu JQ; Chater N; Sanborn AN
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1395-1407. PubMed ID: 35876741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability.
    Babic A; Tokalic R; Amílcar Silva Cunha J; Novak I; Suto J; Vidak M; Miosic I; Vuka I; Poklepovic Pericic T; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):76. PubMed ID: 30953448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review.
    Blalock SJ; Reyna VF
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):781-792. PubMed ID: 27505197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The truth and bias model of judgment.
    West TV; Kenny DA
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):357-78. PubMed ID: 21480740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Cavar M; Dosenovic S; Vuka I; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):170. PubMed ID: 31382898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing risk of bias judgments for blinding of outcome assessors in Cochrane reviews.
    Barcot O; Dosenovic S; Boric M; Pericic TP; Cavar M; Jelicic Kadic A; Puljak L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2020 Jun; 9(8):585-593. PubMed ID: 32459105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Moderators of the Liking Bias in Judgments of Moral Character.
    Bocian K; Baryla W; Wojciszke B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Apr; 48(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 34044652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of contextual information on professional judgment: Reliability and biasability of expert workplace safety inspectors.
    MacLean CL; Dror IE
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():13-22. PubMed ID: 34092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spillover bias in social and nonsocial judgments of diversity and variability.
    Mijalli Y; Price PC; Navarro SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Oct; 30(5):1829-1839. PubMed ID: 36914912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Action and Inaction in Moral Judgments and Decisions: Meta-Analysis of Omission Bias Omission-Commission Asymmetries.
    Yeung SK; Yay T; Feldman G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1499-1515. PubMed ID: 34496694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis.
    McDonald K; Graves R; Yin S; Weese T; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104703. PubMed ID: 33965894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A general model of cognitive bias in human judgment and systematic review specific to forensic mental health.
    Neal TMS; Lienert P; Denne E; Singh JP
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):99-120. PubMed ID: 35191729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?
    Logan P; Ramachandran G; Mulhausen J; Hewett P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jun; 53(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19332428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential biases on subjective judgments: Evidence from face attractiveness and ringtone agreeableness judgment.
    Huang J; He X; Ma X; Ren Y; Zhao T; Zeng X; Li H; Chen Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198723. PubMed ID: 29889850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Omission bias in children's and adults' moral judgments of lies.
    Hayashi H; Mizuta N
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105320. PubMed ID: 34823045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hindsight bias in insight and mathematical problem solving: evidence of different reconstruction mechanisms for metacognitive versus situational judgments.
    Asa IK; Wiley J
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jun; 36(4):822-37. PubMed ID: 18604964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains.
    Barcot O; Boric M; Dosenovic S; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 34275437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A neural-based account of sequential bias during perceptual judgment.
    Hsu SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 33742422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.