These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37319873)

  • 1. Hancock County Medical Association.
    Barnes TL; Pierson D
    Northwest Med Surg J; 1852 Nov; 1(7):334. PubMed ID: 37319873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid community needs assessment after Hurricane Katrina--Hancock County, Mississippi, September 14-15, 2005.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2006 Mar; 55(9):234-6. PubMed ID: 16528229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. April and July Meetings of the Hancock County Medical Association.
    Spitler A
    Chic Med J; 1860 Sep; 17(9):562-564. PubMed ID: 37411551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative analysis of Hancock and St. Jude Medical valve after mitral valve replacement].
    Kazui T; Watanabe A; Morikawa M; Kawamura H; Inaoka M; Yamaguchi T; Yamada O; Komatsu S
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Dec; 39(12):2181-6. PubMed ID: 1774504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Farming and malignant lymphoma in Hancock County, Ohio.
    Dubrow R; Paulson JO; Indian RW
    Br J Ind Med; 1988 Jan; 45(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 3342184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical results of Hancock II versus Hancock Standard at long-term follow-up.
    Valfrè C; Rizzoli G; Zussa C; Ius P; Polesel E; Mirone S; Bottio T; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Sep; 132(3):595-601, 601.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dr. Roy A. Doty: legacy of Hancock County and Hawkins County, Tennessee Medicine.
    Testerman GM
    Tenn Med; 2009 Sep; 102(9):55-6. PubMed ID: 19791544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
    Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Long-term results of mitral valve replacement using glutaraldehyde-treated porcine bioprostheses--comparison of the Hancock and the Liotta valves].
    Kazui T; Morikawa M; Nakanishi K; Tsukamoto M; Yamaguchi T; Yamada O; Komatsu S
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 38(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 2118937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic performance and clinical outcome of pericardial Perimount Magna and Porcine Hancock-II valves in aortic position.
    Caporali E; Bonato R; Klersy C; Ferrari E
    J Card Surg; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 31389647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-up.
    Gallo I; Nistal F; Arbe E; Artiñano E
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr; 61(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 3354445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses.
    Chan V; Kulik A; Tran A; Hendry P; Masters R; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Circulation; 2010 Sep; 122(11 Suppl):S10-6. PubMed ID: 20837899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Echocardiographic and pathologic features of explanted Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position.
    Naqvi TZ; Siegel RJ; Buchbinder NA; Miroshnik S; Saedi G; Trento A; Fishbein MC
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Dec; 84(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 10606116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of Hancock mitral valve by M-mode echocardiography. Clinical significance of the timing of closing and opening of the valve].
    Futamata H; Matsushita S; Shimizu M; Kamio Y; Takizawa Y; Imura T; Matsubara F; Genda A; Tsuchiya K
    J Cardiogr; 1983 Mar; 13(1):125-36. PubMed ID: 6644102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
    Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
    Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Hancock I and Hancock II bioprostheses.
    Oury JH; Angell WW; Koziol JA
    J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):375-81. PubMed ID: 2980040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Hancock modified-orifice porcine bioprosthetic valve: 1976-1988.
    Cohn LH; DiSesa VJ; Collins JJ
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Sep; 48(3 Suppl):S81-2. PubMed ID: 2774756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic factors that affect calculated orifice areas in the mitral hancock xenograft valve.
    Ubago JL; Figueroa A; Colman T; Ochoteco A; Duran CG
    Circulation; 1980 Feb; 61(2):388-94. PubMed ID: 7351065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.