123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37320881)
21. Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.
McDonald ES; Romanoff J; Rahbar H; Kitsch AE; Harvey SM; Whisenant JG; Yankeelov TE; Moy L; DeMartini WB; Dogan BE; Yang WT; Wang LC; Joe BN; Wilmes LJ; Hylton NM; Oh KY; Tudorica LA; Neal CH; Malyarenko DI; Comstock CE; Schnall MD; Chenevert TL; Partridge SC
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 33201788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Added value of clinical decision rules for the management of enhancing breast MRI lesions: A systematic comparison of the Kaiser score and the Göttingen score.
Dietzel M; Bernathova M; Clauser P; Kapetas P; Uder M; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Dec; 169():111185. PubMed ID: 37939606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative DWI implemented after DCE-MRI yields increased specificity for BI-RADS 3 and 4 breast lesions.
Dijkstra H; Dorrius MD; Wielema M; Pijnappel RM; Oudkerk M; Sijens PE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1642-1649. PubMed ID: 27273694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for patients with BI-RADS 3-4 microcalcifications.
Jiang Y; Lou J; Wang S; Zhao Y; Wang C; Wang D
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99669. PubMed ID: 24927476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. US and MRI in the evaluation of mammographic BI-RADS 4 and 5 microcalcifications.
Hrkac Pustahija A; Ivanac G; Brkljacic B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Jul; 24(4):187-194. PubMed ID: 30091708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MRI for the assessment of malignancy in BI-RADS 4 mammographic microcalcifications.
Bennani-Baiti B; Dietzel M; Baltzer PA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188679. PubMed ID: 29190656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Introduction of a breast apparent diffusion coefficient category system (ADC-B) derived from a large multicenter MRI database.
Bickel H; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich T; Biondic I; Brkljacic B; Dietzel M; Ivanac G; Krug B; Moschetta M; Neuhaus V; Preidler K; Baltzer P
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5400-5410. PubMed ID: 37166495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Role of combined clinical-radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting the malignancy of breast non-mass enhancements without an additional diffusion-weighted imaging sequence.
Li Y; Yang Z; Lv W; Qin Y; Tang C; Yan X; Yin T; Ai T; Xia L
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Sep; 13(9):5974-5985. PubMed ID: 37711822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Hottat NA; Badr DA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jul; 56(1):158-170. PubMed ID: 34797013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast MRI: does a clinical decision algorithm outweigh reader experience?
Pötsch N; Korajac A; Stelzer P; Kapetas P; Milos RI; Dietzel M; Helbich TH; Clauser P; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6557-6564. PubMed ID: 35852572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Quantitative Non-Gaussian Diffusion MR Imaging: Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Several Markers of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
Iima M; Kataoka M; Kanao S; Onishi N; Kawai M; Ohashi A; Sakaguchi R; Toi M; Togashi K
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):432-441. PubMed ID: 29095673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using the Kaiser Score as a clinical decision rule for breast lesion classification: Does computer-assisted curve type analysis improve diagnosis?
Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Rainer E; Kapetas P; Milos R; Helbich TH; Baltzer P
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jan; 170():111271. PubMed ID: 38185026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fully automatic classification of breast lesions on multi-parameter MRI using a radiomics model with minimal number of stable, interpretable features.
Zhang J; Zhan C; Zhang C; Song Y; Yan X; Guo Y; Ai T; Yang G
Radiol Med; 2023 Feb; 128(2):160-170. PubMed ID: 36670236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A deep learning model integrating mammography and clinical factors facilitates the malignancy prediction of BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications in breast cancer screening.
Liu H; Chen Y; Zhang Y; Wang L; Luo R; Wu H; Wu C; Zhang H; Tan W; Yin H; Wang D
Eur Radiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):5902-5912. PubMed ID: 33496829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing tumor microstructure and improving diagnostic performance on breast MRI: a prospective observational study.
Luo J; Hippe DS; Rahbar H; Parsian S; Rendi MH; Partridge SC
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Sep; 21(1):102. PubMed ID: 31484577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: correlation with pathological findings.
Ramírez-Galván YA; Cardona-Huerta S; Ibarra-Fombona E; Elizondo-Riojas G
Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25457520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A simplified scoring protocol to improve diagnostic accuracy with the breast imaging reporting and data system in breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Zhong Y; Li M; Zhu J; Zhang B; Liu M; Wang Z; Wang J; Zheng Y; Cheng L; Li X
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jul; 12(7):3860-3872. PubMed ID: 35782247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using synthetic relaxometry and the Kaiser score.
Meng L; Zhao X; Guo J; Lu L; Cheng M; Xing Q; Shang H; Wang K; Zhang B; Lei D; Zhang X
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():964078. PubMed ID: 36303839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
