These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37320910)

  • 1. A comparison of the psychological effects of robot motion in physical and virtual environments.
    Sanders NE; Xie Z; Chen KB
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Oct; 112():104039. PubMed ID: 37320910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of the efficacy of collaborative virtual reality systems for moderated remote usability testing.
    Chalil Madathil K; Greenstein JS
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():501-514. PubMed ID: 28256209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imposing Motion Variability for Ergonomic Human-Robot Collaboration.
    Zolotas M; Luo R; Bazzi S; Saha D; Mabulu K; Kloeckl K; Padır T
    IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024; 12(1-2):123-134. PubMed ID: 38498062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three different techniques for camera and motion control of a teleoperated robot.
    Doisy G; Ronen A; Edan Y
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():527-534. PubMed ID: 27181096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eye-Tracking in Physical Human-Robot Interaction: Mental Workload and Performance Prediction.
    Upasani S; Srinivasan D; Zhu Q; Du J; Leonessa A
    Hum Factors; 2024 Aug; 66(8):2104-2119. PubMed ID: 37793896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.
    Lin DW; Romanelli JR; Kuhn JN; Thompson RE; Bush RW; Seymour NE
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 18297349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of cognitive conflict during unexpected robot behavior under different mental workload conditions in a physical human-robot collaboration.
    John AR; Singh AK; Gramann K; Liu D; Lin CT
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Mar; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 38295415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of an Integrated Virtual Reality System with Wearable Sensors for Ergonomic Evaluation of Human-Robot Cooperative Workplaces.
    Caporaso T; Grazioso S; Di Gironimo G
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 35336584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validating advanced robot-assisted laparoscopic training task in virtual reality.
    Brown-Clerk B; Siu KC; Katsavelis D; Lee I; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():45-9. PubMed ID: 18391254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Haptic and Visual Feedback Assistance for Dual-Arm Robot Teleoperation in Surface Conditioning Tasks.
    Girbes-Juan V; Schettino V; Demiris Y; Tornero J
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2021; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 32746376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved Mutual Understanding for Human-Robot Collaboration: Combining Human-Aware Motion Planning with Haptic Feedback Devices for Communicating Planned Trajectory.
    Grushko S; Vysocký A; Oščádal P; Vocetka M; Novák P; Bobovský Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34070528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency of performance of robot-assisted surgical tasks in virtual reality.
    Suh IH; Siu KC; Mukherjee M; Monk E; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():369-73. PubMed ID: 19377186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence on the user's emotional state of the graphic complexity level in virtual therapies based on a robot-assisted neuro-rehabilitation platform.
    Villar BF; Viñas PF; Turiel JP; Carlos Fraile Marinero J; Gordaliza A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jul; 190():105359. PubMed ID: 32036205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-Assisted Reaching Performance of Chronic Stroke and Healthy Individuals in a Virtual Versus a Physical Environment: A Pilot Study.
    Norouzi-Gheidari N; Archambault PS; Fung J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2019 Jun; 27(6):1273-1281. PubMed ID: 31056500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adding Haptic Feedback to Virtual Environments With a Cable-Driven Robot Improves Upper Limb Spatio-Temporal Parameters During a Manual Handling Task.
    Faure C; Fortin-Cote A; Robitaille N; Cardou P; Gosselin C; Laurendeau D; Mercier C; Bouyer L; McFadyen BJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Oct; 28(10):2246-2254. PubMed ID: 32877337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual environments applications and applied ergonomics.
    Wilson JR
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Feb; 30(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10098812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The stress and workload of virtual reality training: the effects of presence, immersion and flow.
    Lackey SJ; Salcedo JN; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Ergonomics; 2016 Aug; 59(8):1060-72. PubMed ID: 26977540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual Obstacle Avoidance Strategy: Navigating through a Complex Environment While Interacting with Virtual and Physical Elements.
    Machado F; Loureiro M; Bezerra M; Zimerer C; Mello R; Frizera A
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Sep; 24(19):. PubMed ID: 39409252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of navigation interfaces in virtual reality environments: A mixed-method approach.
    Kim YM; Rhiu I
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103482. PubMed ID: 34116411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review on ergonomics evaluations of virtual reality.
    Chen Y; Wu Z
    Work; 2023; 74(3):831-841. PubMed ID: 36442175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.