126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37322984)
1. A comparative study on daily evapotranspiration estimation by using various artificial intelligence techniques and traditional regression calculations.
Güzel H; Üneş F; Erginer M; Kaya YZ; Taşar B; Erginer İ; Demirci M
Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Apr; 20(6):11328-11352. PubMed ID: 37322984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial intelligence models versus empirical equations for modeling monthly reference evapotranspiration.
Tikhamarine Y; Malik A; Souag-Gamane D; Kisi O
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Aug; 27(24):30001-30019. PubMed ID: 32445152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and multiple linear regression (MLR) for modeling of Cu (II) adsorption from aqueous solution using biochar derived from rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) peel.
Wong YJ; Arumugasamy SK; Chung CH; Selvarajoo A; Sethu V
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jun; 192(7):439. PubMed ID: 32556670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reference evapotranspiration estimate with missing climatic data and multiple linear regression models.
Koç DL; Erkan Can M
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15252. PubMed ID: 37131990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Banerjee G; Sarkar U; Sarkar S; Ghosh I
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17437. PubMed ID: 38832031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evolving connectionist systems (ECoSs): a new approach for modeling daily reference evapotranspiration (ET
Heddam S; Watts MJ; Houichi L; Djemili L; Sebbar A
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Aug; 190(9):516. PubMed ID: 30109518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving one-dimensional pollution dispersion modeling in rivers using ANFIS and ANN-based GA optimized models.
Seifi A; Riahi-Madvar H
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(1):867-885. PubMed ID: 30415370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting coagulation-flocculation process for turbidity removal from water using graphene oxide: a comparative study on ANN, SVR, ANFIS, and RSM models.
Ghasemi M; Hasani Zonoozi M; Rezania N; Saadatpour M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(48):72839-72852. PubMed ID: 35616836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Estimation of evapotranspiration and crop coefficient in Dajiuhu peatland of Shennongjia based on FAO56 Penman-Monteith].
Hu C; Ge JW; Xu XN; Tan YS; Yuan CH
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 May; 31(5):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 32530249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of Greenhouse Tomato Crop Evapotranspiration Using XGBoost Machine Learning Model.
Ge J; Zhao L; Yu Z; Liu H; Zhang L; Gong X; Sun H
Plants (Basel); 2022 Jul; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35893626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative assessment of deep belief network and hybrid adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model based on a meta-heuristic optimization algorithm for precise predictions of the potential evapotranspiration.
Akiner ME; Ghasri M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jun; 31(30):42719-42749. PubMed ID: 38879646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of various artificial intelligence approaches performance for estimating suspended sediment load of river systems: a case study in United States.
Olyaie E; Banejad H; Chau KW; Melesse AM
Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Apr; 187(4):189. PubMed ID: 25787167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An improved model based on the support vector machine and cuckoo algorithm for simulating reference evapotranspiration.
Ehteram M; Singh VP; Ferdowsi A; Mousavi SF; Farzin S; Karami H; Mohd NS; Afan HA; Lai SH; Kisi O; Malek MA; Ahmed AN; El-Shafie A
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217499. PubMed ID: 31150443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing three types of data-driven models for monthly evapotranspiration prediction under heterogeneous climatic conditions.
Aghelpour P; Varshavian V; Khodamorad Pour M; Hamedi Z
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17363. PubMed ID: 36253432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP.
Jalal FE; Xu Y; Iqbal M; Javed MF; Jamhiri B
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 289():112420. PubMed ID: 33831756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced machine learning-based kharif maize evapotranspiration estimation in semi-arid climate.
Jatav MS; Sarangi A; Singh DK; Sahoo RN; Varghese C
Water Sci Technol; 2023 Aug; 88(4):991-1014. PubMed ID: 37651334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of artificial intelligence models for prediction of groundwater level fluctuations: case study (Tehran-Karaj alluvial aquifer).
Vadiati M; Rajabi Yami Z; Eskandari E; Nakhaei M; Kisi O
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):619. PubMed ID: 35904687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of multilayer perceptron neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for the mass transfer modeling of Echium amoenum Fisch. & C. A. Mey.
Chasiotis V; Nadi F; Filios A
J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Dec; 101(15):6514-6524. PubMed ID: 34000064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modelling monthly mean air temperature using artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and support vector regression methods: A case of study for Turkey.
Yakut E; Süzülmüş S
Network; 2020; 31(1-4):1-36. PubMed ID: 32397767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation of artificial intelligence paradigms-artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for flood prediction.
Tabbussum R; Dar AQ
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(20):25265-25282. PubMed ID: 33453033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
