These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37323756)
1. Analysis of Trustworthiness and Readability of English and Spanish Hypo- and Hyperthyroid-Related Online Patient Education Information. Parikh C; Ostrovsky AM J Patient Exp; 2023; 10():23743735231179063. PubMed ID: 37323756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality, Readability, and Accessibility of Online Content From a Google Search of "Macular Degeneration": Critical Analysis. Hua HU; Rayess N; Li AS; Do D; Rahimy E J Vitreoretin Dis; 2022; 6(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 37009540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts. Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery. Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Readability, Credibility, and Quality of Spanish-Language Online Educational Resources for Knee Arthroplasty: Implications for Patient Education and Health Disparities. Busigó Torres R; Restrepo Mejia M; Arroyave JS; Stern BZ; Chen DD; Moucha CS; Poeran J; Hayden BL J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39378370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trustworthiness, Readability, and Suitability of Web-Based Information for Stroke Prevention and Self-Management for Korean Americans: Critical Evaluation. Lee MA; Shin CN; An K Interact J Med Res; 2018 Jul; 7(2):e10440. PubMed ID: 30030210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information. Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Quality of Online Information on Glaucoma. Shah R; Mahajan J; Oydanich M; Khouri AS Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 35940574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review. Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information. Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical appraisal of web-based information on shoulder pain comparing biomedical vs. psychosocial information. Barrett DR; Boone JD; Butch JO; Cavender JA; Sole G; Wassinger CA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jan; 32(1):e23-e32. PubMed ID: 36108880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur. Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Online Kidney Stone Educational Materials Do Not Meet Recommended Readability Standards. Bergersen AM; Khan I; Wong AC; Chipollini JJ; Weiss BD; Tzou DT Urol Pract; 2021 Mar; 8(2):246-252. PubMed ID: 37145608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and Readability of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Prevention-Related Websites. Howard T; Willgruber A; Kinealy B; Adkins D; Jones R; Bush M Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Dec; 171(6):1758-1763. PubMed ID: 39091239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Online Sites Reliability, Accountability, Readability, Accessibility, and Translation for Intravitreal Injections. Rayess N; Li AS; Do DV; Rahimy E Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Dec; 4(12):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 32497854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality, Trustworthiness, Readability, and Accuracy of Medical Information Regarding Common Pediatric Emergency Medicine-Related Complaints on the Web. Rothrock SG; Rothrock AN; Swetland SB; Pagane M; Isaak SA; Romney J; Chavez V; Chavez SH J Emerg Med; 2019 Oct; 57(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 31561928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability and Quality of Online Information on Osteoarthritis: An Objective Analysis With Historic Comparison. Murray KE; Murray TE; O'Rourke AC; Low C; Veale DJ Interact J Med Res; 2019 Sep; 8(3):e12855. PubMed ID: 31538953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study. Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can We Go Online for Sports Injury Prevention? A Systematic Review of English-Language Websites with Exercise-Based Sports Injury Risk Reduction Programmes. Mącznik AK; Mehta P; Kaur M Sports Med Open; 2021 Oct; 7(1):80. PubMed ID: 34716826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An objective analysis of quality and readability of online information on COVID-19. Wrigley Kelly NE; Murray KE; McCarthy C; O'Shea DB Health Technol (Berl); 2021; 11(5):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 34189011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]