BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37326540)

  • 1. Structure shapes the representation of a novel category.
    Solomon SH; Schapiro AC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Mar; 50(3):458-483. PubMed ID: 37326540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning relational concepts from within- versus between-category comparisons.
    Corral D; Kurtz KJ; Jones M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1571-1596. PubMed ID: 30372111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning about the internal structure of categories through classification and feature inference.
    Jee BD; Wiley J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1786-807. PubMed ID: 24320007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation.
    Binder JR; Conant LL; Humphries CJ; Fernandino L; Simons SB; Aguilar M; Desai RH
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2016; 33(3-4):130-74. PubMed ID: 27310469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The representational glue for incidental category learning is alignment with task-relevant behavior.
    Roark CL; Lehet MI; Dick F; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):769-784. PubMed ID: 34570548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning and generalization of within-category representations in a rule-based category structure.
    Ell SW; Smith DB; Deng R; Hélie S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2448-2462. PubMed ID: 32333374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing methods of category learning: Classification versus feature inference.
    Morgan EL; Johansen MK
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):710-730. PubMed ID: 32078736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of age on category learning and prototype- and exemplar-based generalization.
    Bowman CR; Iwashita T; Zeithamova D
    Psychol Aging; 2022 Nov; 37(7):800-815. PubMed ID: 36222646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.
    Kloos H; Sloutsky VM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):52-72. PubMed ID: 18248129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The semantics-syntax interface: Learning grammatical categories and hierarchical syntactic structure through semantics.
    Poletiek FH; Monaghan P; van de Velde M; Bocanegra BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1141-1155. PubMed ID: 34694843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature highlighting enhances learning of a complex natural-science category.
    Miyatsu T; Gouravajhala R; Nosofsky RM; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 29698049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding categories through words: More nameable features improve category learning.
    Zettersten M; Lupyan G
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104135. PubMed ID: 31821963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of category structure and training methodology on learning and generalizing within-category representations.
    Ell SW; Smith DB; Peralta G; Hélie S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1777-1794. PubMed ID: 28584954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature distribution and background knowledge in category learning.
    Murphy GL; Kaplan AS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):962-82. PubMed ID: 11131823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequence as context in category learning: An eyetracking study.
    Zaki SR; Salmi IL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1942-1954. PubMed ID: 30816766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. That means something to me: How linguistic and emotional experience affect the acquisition, representation, and processing of novel abstract concepts.
    Espey L; Ghio M; Bellebaum C; Bechtold L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; 50(4):622-636. PubMed ID: 37053423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Redundancy in perceptual and linguistic experience: comparing feature-based and distributional models of semantic representation.
    Riordan B; Jones MN
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Apr; 3(2):303-45. PubMed ID: 25164298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More than one kind of inference: re-examining what's learned in feature inference and classification.
    Sweller N; Hayes BK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1568-89. PubMed ID: 20373228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic influences on episodic memory distortions.
    Tompary A; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Sep; 150(9):1800-1824. PubMed ID: 33475397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of training methodology and category structure on the formation of new categories from existing knowledge.
    Hélie S; Shamloo F; Ell SW
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jun; 84(4):990-1005. PubMed ID: 30368558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.