These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37326548)

  • 21. Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review.
    Blalock SJ; Reyna VF
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):781-792. PubMed ID: 27505197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment.
    de Vel-Palumbo M; Ferguson R; Schein C; Chang MX; Bastian B
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0272061. PubMed ID: 35881629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
    Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual differences in numerical representations of risk in health decision making: A fuzzy-trace theory approach.
    Brust-Renck PG; Reyna VF
    Risk Anal; 2023 Mar; 43(3):548-557. PubMed ID: 35297070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
    Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The "Partial Innocence" Effect: False Guilty Pleas to Partially Unethical Behaviors.
    Cardenas SA; Sanchez PY; Kassin SM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Jul; ():1461672231185639. PubMed ID: 37491946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: does zealous representation apply equally to all?
    Edkins VA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 21103915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.
    Hoetger LA; Devine DJ; Brank EM; Drew RM; Rees R
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):121-139. PubMed ID: 35084906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decision-making and risk in bipolar disorder: A quantitative study using fuzzy trace theory.
    Sicilia AC; Lukacs JN; Jones S; Perez Algorta G
    Psychol Psychother; 2020 Mar; 93(1):105-121. PubMed ID: 30677209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
    Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Supporting Health and Medical Decision Making: Findings and Insights from Fuzzy-Trace Theory.
    Reyna VF; Edelson S; Hayes B; Garavito D
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Aug; 42(6):741-754. PubMed ID: 35735225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Race, witness credibility, and jury deliberation in a simulated drug trafficking trial.
    Shaw EV; Lynch M; Laguna S; Frenda SJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):215-228. PubMed ID: 34351204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of verbatim versus gist formatting on younger and older adults' information acquisition and decision-making.
    Nolte J; Löckenhoff CE; Reyna VF
    Psychol Aging; 2022 Mar; 37(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 35084895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The importance of forensic evidence for decisions on criminal guilt.
    Ling S; Kaplan J; Berryessa CM
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33736846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
    Slane CR; Dodson CS
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.
    Riedel RG
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Dec; 73(3 Pt 1):819-32. PubMed ID: 8302986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of forensic mental health reports on decisions about guilt in the Netherlands: An experimental approach.
    van Es R; de Keijser J; Kunst M; van Doorn J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2022; 80():101760. PubMed ID: 34861487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Toward a method for evaluating court actor influences on plea negotiations: A preliminary exploration of public defenders.
    Metcalfe C
    Behav Sci Law; 2021 Jun; 39(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 34031905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
    Ruva CL; Guenther CC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.