These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37326911)

  • 21. Item Cloning Variation and the Impact on the Parameters of Response Models.
    Lathrop QN; Cheng Y
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):245-263. PubMed ID: 27699558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance.
    Buchholz J; Hartig J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 31019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach.
    Palmgren PJ; Brodin U; Nilsson GH; Watson R; Stenfors T
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 18(1):235. PubMed ID: 30305143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and Psychometric Characteristics of the TBI-QOL Independence Item Bank and Short Form and the TBI-QOL Asking for Help Scale.
    Kisala PA; Tulsky DS; Boulton AJ; Heinemann AW; Victorson D; Sherer M; Sander AM; Chiaravalloti N; Carlozzi NE; Hanks R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 101(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 31473207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity and reliability evidence for the scale of distance education satisfaction of medical students based on item response theory (IRT).
    Toraman Ç; Karadağ E; Polat M
    BMC Med Educ; 2022 Feb; 22(1):94. PubMed ID: 35148765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1070-85. PubMed ID: 26208813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Item response theory analysis of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.
    Costa DSJ; Asghari A; Nicholas MK
    Scand J Pain; 2017 Jan; 14():113-117. PubMed ID: 28850425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Refinement of the French sociotropy-autonomy scale: Validation of a 20-item measure of social dependency among first-year students at the university].
    Lefeuvre E; Jean M; Guihard G
    Encephale; 2020 Aug; 46(4):248-257. PubMed ID: 31928742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling Changes in Response Style with Longitudinal IRTree Models.
    Ames AJ; Leventhal BC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(5):859-878. PubMed ID: 34061692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correcting for Extreme Response Style: Model Choice Matters.
    Schoenmakers M; Tijmstra J; Vermunt J; Bolsinova M
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):145-170. PubMed ID: 38250509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examination of the Measurement Equivalence of the Functional Assessment in Acute Care MCAT (FAMCAT) Mobility Item Bank Using Differential Item Functioning Analyses.
    Teresi JA; Ocepek-Welikson K; Ramirez M; Kleinman M; Wang C; Weiss DJ; Cheville A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 May; 103(5S):S84-S107.e38. PubMed ID: 34146534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and validation of the Cancer Knowledge Scale for the general population: An item response theory approach.
    Kimata A; Kumagai K; Kondo N; Adachi K; Fujita R; Tsuchiya M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Jan; 105(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 34020840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. PROMIS Pediatric Anger Scale: an item response theory analysis.
    Irwin DE; Stucky BD; Langer MM; Thissen D; DeWitt EM; Lai JS; Yeatts KB; Varni JW; DeWalt DA
    Qual Life Res; 2012 May; 21(4):697-706. PubMed ID: 21785833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Data-driven item selection for the Shirts and Shoes Test.
    Tucci A; Plante E; Vance R; Oglivie T
    J Commun Disord; 2019; 78():46-56. PubMed ID: 30703736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of response dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model.
    Marais I; Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(2):105-24. PubMed ID: 18480508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Approximate Functional Relationship between IRT and CTT Item Discrimination Indices: A Simulation, Validation, and Practical Extension of Lord's (1980) Formula.
    Kulas JT; Smith JA; Xu H
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 29252208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and Diagnostic Accuracy of a Shortened Dutch Naming Test for People with Aphasia Using Item Response Theory.
    Alons E; Dijkhuis L; van Tuijl P; van Ewijk L
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Nov; 37(8):1735-1748. PubMed ID: 35870204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.
    Wolcott MD; Olsen AA; Augustine JM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Sep; 14(9):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 36154966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records.
    Dregan A; Grieve A; van Staa T; Gulliford MC;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Dec; 11():168. PubMed ID: 22176509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.