These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37327907)
1. Are citizens willing to pay for the ecosystem services supported by Common Agricultural Policy? A non-market valuation by choice experiment. Blasi E; Rossi ES; Zabala JÁ; Fosci L; Sorrentino A Sci Total Environ; 2023 Oct; 893():164783. PubMed ID: 37327907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Possibilities and requirements for introducing agri-environment measures in land consolidation projects in China, evidence from ecosystem services and farmers' attitudes. Li P; Chen Y; Hu W; Li X; Yu Z; Liu Y Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 650(Pt 2):3145-3155. PubMed ID: 30373091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Socio-cultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by Mediterranean mountain agroecosystems. Bernués A; Rodríguez-Ortega T; Ripoll-Bosch R; Alfnes F PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102479. PubMed ID: 25036276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targeting best agricultural practices to enhance ecosystem services in European mountains. Bernués A; Tenza-Peral A; Gómez-Baggethun E; Clemetsen M; Eik LO; Martín-Collado D J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 316():115255. PubMed ID: 35576705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunities and challenges for Common Agricultural Policy reform to support the European Green Deal. Cuadros-Casanova I; Cristiano A; Biancolini D; Cimatti M; Sessa AA; Mendez Angarita VY; Dragonetti C; Pacifici M; Rondinini C; Di Marco M Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14052. PubMed ID: 36661057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Landowners' Socio-Cultural Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Costa Rican Agricultural Landscapes. Leary J; Grimm K; Aslan C; Mark M; Frey S; Bath-Rosenfeld R Environ Manage; 2021 May; 67(5):974-987. PubMed ID: 33661346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management. Batáry P; Dicks LV; Kleijn D; Sutherland WJ Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1006-1016. PubMed ID: 25997591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impacts of Agricultural Practices and Individual Life Characteristics on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study on Family Farmers in the Context of an Amazonian Pioneer Front. Solen LC; Nicolas J; de Sartre Xavier A; Thibaud D; Simon D; Michel G; Johan O Environ Manage; 2018 May; 61(5):772-785. PubMed ID: 29497779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming. Dumont B; Ryschawy J; Duru M; Benoit M; Chatellier V; Delaby L; Donnars C; Dupraz P; Lemauviel-Lavenant S; Méda B; Vollet D; Sabatier R Animal; 2019 Aug; 13(8):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 30333070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Greening, new frontiers for research and employment in the agro-food sector. Singh M; Marchis A; Capri E Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 472():437-43. PubMed ID: 24295760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland. McGurk E; Hynes S; Thorne F J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 262():110243. PubMed ID: 32250775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Considering Farmers' Heterogeneity to Payment Ecosystem Services Participation: A Choice Experiment and Agent-Based Model Analysis in Xin'an River Basin, China. Li S; Hui B; Jin C; Liu X; Xu F; Su C; Li T Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 35742439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Farmers' Preferences for Future Agricultural Land Use Under the Consideration of Climate Change. Pröbstl-Haider U; Mostegl NM; Kelemen-Finan J; Haider W; Formayer H; Kantelhardt J; Moser T; Kapfer M; Trenholm R Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):446-64. PubMed ID: 27372660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Pretty J Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Feb; 363(1491):447-65. PubMed ID: 17652074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Varying potential of conservation tools of the Common Agricultural Policy for farmland bird preservation. Concepción ED; Díaz M Sci Total Environ; 2019 Dec; 694():133618. PubMed ID: 31386949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How agricultural multiple ecosystem services respond to socioeconomic factors in Mengyin County, China. Chen Y; Yu Z; Li X; Li P Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 630():1003-1015. PubMed ID: 29554722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trees are all around us: Farmers' management of wood pastures in the light of a controversial policy. Sandberg M; Jakobsson S J Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 212():228-235. PubMed ID: 29438928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the relative impact of climate and economic changes on forest and agricultural ecosystem services in mountain regions. Briner S; Elkin C; Huber R J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():414-22. PubMed ID: 23995509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The gap between experts, farmers and non-farmers on perceived environmental vulnerability and the influence of values and beliefs. Bergtold JS; Caldas MM; Ramsey SM; Sanderson MR; Granco G; Mather ME J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 316():115186. PubMed ID: 35561495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multiscale integrated analysis of the factors characterizing the sustainability of food systems in Europe. Cadillo-Benalcazar JJ; Renner A; Giampietro M J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():110944. PubMed ID: 32778267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]