191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37328705)
21. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches.
Srivastava HK; Sastry GN
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Calculate protein-ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3.
He X; Man VH; Ji B; Xie XQ; Wang J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 30218199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Test MM-PB/SA on true conformational ensembles of protein-ligand complexes.
Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Sep; 50(9):1682-92. PubMed ID: 20695488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Addressing limitations with the MM-GB/SA scoring procedure using the WaterMap method and free energy perturbation calculations.
Guimarães CR; Mathiowetz AM
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):547-59. PubMed ID: 20235592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. End-Point Binding Free Energy Calculation with MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA: Strategies and Applications in Drug Design.
Wang E; Sun H; Wang J; Wang Z; Liu H; Zhang JZH; Hou T
Chem Rev; 2019 Aug; 119(16):9478-9508. PubMed ID: 31244000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Case-specific performance of MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and SIE in virtual screening.
Virtanen SI; Niinivehmas SP; Pentikäinen OT
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Nov; 62():303-318. PubMed ID: 26550792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. FEW: a workflow tool for free energy calculations of ligand binding.
Homeyer N; Gohlke H
J Comput Chem; 2013 Apr; 34(11):965-73. PubMed ID: 23288722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set.
Sun H; Li Y; Tian S; Xu L; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 16(31):16719-29. PubMed ID: 24999761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Binding mode analysis, dynamic simulation and binding free energy calculations of the MurF ligase from Acinetobacter baumannii.
Ahmad S; Raza S; Uddin R; Azam SS
J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Oct; 77():72-85. PubMed ID: 28843462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Crystal molecular dynamics simulations to speed up MM/PB(GB)SA evaluation of binding free energies of di-mannose deoxy analogs with P51G-m4-Cyanovirin-N.
Vorontsov II; Miyashita O
J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(6):1043-53. PubMed ID: 20949512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development and test of highly accurate endpoint free energy methods. 1: Evaluation of ABCG2 charge model on solvation free energy prediction and optimization of atom radii suitable for more accurate solvation free energy prediction by the PBSA method.
Sun Y; He X; Hou T; Cai L; Man VH; Wang J
J Comput Chem; 2023 May; 44(14):1334-1346. PubMed ID: 36807356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Binding Free Energies of Conformationally Disordered Peptides Through Extensive Sampling and End-Point Methods.
Nixon MG; Fadda E
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2039():229-242. PubMed ID: 31342430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tuning Potential Functions to Host-Guest Binding Data.
Setiadi J; Boothroyd S; Slochower DR; Dotson DL; Thompson MW; Wagner JR; Wang LP; Gilson MK
J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 Jan; 20(1):239-252. PubMed ID: 38147689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Converging free energy estimates: MM-PB(GB)SA studies on the protein-protein complex Ras-Raf.
Gohlke H; Case DA
J Comput Chem; 2004 Jan; 25(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 14648622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. VSTH: a user-friendly web server for structure-based virtual screening on Tianhe-2.
Mo Q; Xu Z; Yan H; Chen P; Lu Y
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36394260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Large scale free energy calculations for blind predictions of protein-ligand binding: the D3R Grand Challenge 2015.
Deng N; Flynn WF; Xia J; Vijayan RS; Zhang B; He P; Mentes A; Gallicchio E; Levy RM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Sep; 30(9):743-751. PubMed ID: 27562018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rigorous Free Energy Simulations in Virtual Screening.
Cournia Z; Allen BK; Beuming T; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Sep; 60(9):4153-4169. PubMed ID: 32539386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. AMBER Drug Discovery Boost Tools: Automated Workflow for Production Free-Energy Simulation Setup and Analysis (ProFESSA).
Ganguly A; Tsai HC; Fernández-Pendás M; Lee TS; Giese TJ; York DM
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Dec; 62(23):6069-6083. PubMed ID: 36450130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pharmacophore modeling, multiple docking, and molecular dynamics studies on Wee1 kinase inhibitors.
Hu Y; Zhou L; Zhu X; Dai D; Bao Y; Qiu Y
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2019 Jul; 37(10):2703-2715. PubMed ID: 30052133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Identifying and Overcoming the Sampling Challenges in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of a Model Protein:Protein Complex.
Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD
J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):4863-4882. PubMed ID: 37450482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
