These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37330468)

  • 1. Covariance regression with random forests.
    Alakus C; Larocque D; Labbe A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 24(1):258. PubMed ID: 37330468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditional canonical correlation estimation based on covariates with random forests.
    Alakuş C; Larocque D; Jacquemont S; Barlaam F; Martin CO; Agbogba K; Lippé S; Labbe A
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(17):2714-2721. PubMed ID: 33693547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the conditional inference survival forest model to random survival forests based on a simulation study as well as on two applications with time-to-event data.
    Nasejje JB; Mwambi H; Dheda K; Lesosky M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):115. PubMed ID: 28754093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variable importance-weighted Random Forests.
    Liu Y; Zhao H
    Quant Biol; 2017 Dec; 5(4):338-351. PubMed ID: 30034909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the random effects covariance matrix for longitudinal data with covariates measurement error.
    Hoque ME; Torabi M
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4167-4184. PubMed ID: 30039601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multilevel covariance regression with correlated random effects in the mean and variance structure.
    Quintero A; Lesaffre E
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):1047-1066. PubMed ID: 28692751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction intervals with random forests.
    Roy MH; Larocque D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jan; 29(1):205-229. PubMed ID: 30786820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using maximally selected rank statistics.
    Wright MN; Dankowski T; Ziegler A
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 28088842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.
    Strobl C; Boulesteix AL; Zeileis A; Hothorn T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 8():25. PubMed ID: 17254353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-parametric individual treatment effect estimation for survival data with random forests.
    Tabib S; Larocque D
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(2):629-636. PubMed ID: 31373350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of random survival forests in understanding the determinants of under-five child mortality in Uganda in the presence of covariates that satisfy the proportional and non-proportional hazards assumption.
    Nasejje JB; Mwambi H
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Sep; 10(1):459. PubMed ID: 28882171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. L₁ splitting rules in survival forests.
    Moradian H; Larocque D; Bellavance F
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Oct; 23(4):671-691. PubMed ID: 27379423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Random forest methodology for model-based recursive partitioning: the mobForest package for R.
    Garge NR; Bobashev G; Eggleston B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 14():125. PubMed ID: 23577585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian Inference for Multivariate Meta-regression with a Partially Observed Within-Study Sample Covariance Matrix.
    Yao H; Kim S; Chen MH; Ibrahim JG; Shah AK; Lin J
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015 Jun; 110(510):528-544. PubMed ID: 26257452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of forest methods for time-to-event data: variable selection and predictive performance.
    Liu Y; Zhou S; Wei H; An S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 34563138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling X Chromosome Data Using Random Forests: Conquering Sex Bias.
    Winham SJ; Jenkins GD; Biernacka JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 26639183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A heteroskedastic error covariance matrix estimator using a first-order conditional autoregressive Markov simulation for deriving asympotical efficient estimates from ecological sampled Anopheles arabiensis aquatic habitat covariates.
    Jacob BG; Griffith DA; Muturi EJ; Caamano EX; Githure JI; Novak RJ
    Malar J; 2009 Sep; 8():216. PubMed ID: 19772590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intervention in prediction measure: a new approach to assessing variable importance for random forests.
    Epifanio I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):230. PubMed ID: 28464827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival forests for data with dependent censoring.
    Moradian H; Larocque D; Bellavance F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):445-461. PubMed ID: 28835170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the variable importance in random forests under correlations: a general concept applied to donor organ quality in post-transplant survival.
    Wies C; Miltenberger R; Grieser G; Jahn-Eimermacher A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Sep; 23(1):209. PubMed ID: 37726680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.