154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37330544)
1. Correlation between standardized uptake value of
Shin DJ; Choi H; Oh DK; Sung HP; Kim JH; Kim DH; Kim SY
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9844. PubMed ID: 37330544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive and prognostic potential of volume-based metabolic variables obtained by a baseline
Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Amo-Salas M; Molina D; Jimenez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón AM; Pena Pardo FJ; Martínez-González A
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 29102649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metabolic Tumor Burden Assessed by Dual Time Point [
Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Pérez-García VM; Molina D; Jiménez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón A; Martínez-González A
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):636-644. PubMed ID: 27981471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of pretreatment
Han S; Lee SB; Gong G; Lee J; Chae SY; Oh JS; Moon DH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Apr; 198(2):207-215. PubMed ID: 36633721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subtype-Guided
Wu S; Wang Y; Li J; Zhang N; Mo M; Klimberg S; Kaklamani V; Cochet A; Shao Z; Cheng J; Liu G
Oncologist; 2020 Apr; 25(4):e626-e633. PubMed ID: 32297448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of
Mori M; Fujioka T; Ichikawa R; Inomata R; Katsuta L; Yashima Y; Yamaga E; Tsuchiya J; Hayashi K; Kumaki Y; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Kubota K; Tateishi U
Tomography; 2022 Oct; 8(5):2533-2546. PubMed ID: 36287810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of
Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
Groheux D; Martineau A; Teixeira L; Espié M; de Cremoux P; Bertheau P; Merlet P; Lemarignier C
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 28057031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Prognostic Impact of Early Change in 18F-FDG PET SUV After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.
Lee HW; Lee HM; Choi SE; Yoo H; Ahn SG; Lee MK; Jeong J; Jung WH
J Nucl Med; 2016 Aug; 57(8):1183-8. PubMed ID: 27033896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of Metabolic Tumor Volume at Baseline and Reduction of Mean Standardized Uptake Value in
Higuchi T; Fujimoto Y; Ozawa H; Bun A; Fukui R; Miyagawa Y; Imamura M; Kitajima K; Yamakado K; Miyoshi Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):2175-2183. PubMed ID: 30941655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.
Ueda S; Tsuda H; Asakawa H; Shigekawa T; Fukatsu K; Kondo N; Yamamoto M; Hama Y; Tamura K; Ishida J; Abe Y; Mochizuki H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 38(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 18407934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation of
Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of single-voxel (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Cho N; Im SA; Kang KW; Park IA; Song IC; Lee KH; Kim TY; Lee H; Chun IK; Yoon HJ; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2279-90. PubMed ID: 26376886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with sarcomas: interobserver variability of quantitative parameters in treatment-induced changes in histopathologically responding and nonresponding tumors.
Benz MR; Evilevitch V; Allen-Auerbach MS; Eilber FC; Phelps ME; Czernin J; Weber WA
J Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 49(7):1038-46. PubMed ID: 18552153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Baseline Tumor 18F-FDG Uptake and Modifications After 2 Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Are Prognostic of Outcome in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.
Groheux D; Sanna A; Majdoub M; de Cremoux P; Giacchetti S; Teixeira L; Espié M; Merlet P; de Roquancourt A; Visvikis D; Hatt M; Resche-Rigon M; Hindié E
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 56(6):824-31. PubMed ID: 25883123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volume-based metabolic parameter of breast cancer on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT could predict axillary lymph node metastasis.
An YS; Kang DK; Jung Y; Kim TH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Nov; 96(45):e8557. PubMed ID: 29137072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
