These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37330872)

  • 1. Evaluation of driver demand for in-vehicle information: An integrated method combining clustering and multivariate ordered probit model.
    Li J; Zhang W; Zhu D; Feng Z; He Z; Yue Q; Huang Z
    J Safety Res; 2023 Jun; 85():222-233. PubMed ID: 37330872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Young Novice Drivers' Cognitive Distraction Detection: Comparing Support Vector Machines and Random Forest Model of Vehicle Control Behavior.
    Xue Q; Wang X; Li Y; Guo W
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic is optimal: Effect of three alternative auto-complete on the usability of in-vehicle dialing displays and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Zhi J; Guo G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 34937441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How are different sources of distraction associated with at-fault crashes among drivers of different age gender groups?
    Liang OS; Yang CC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106505. PubMed ID: 34844081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced driver assistance systems for teen drivers: Teen and parent impressions, perceived need, and intervention preferences.
    Weiss E; Fisher Thiel M; Sultana N; Hannan C; Seacrist T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S120-S124. PubMed ID: 29584476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Understanding driver distractions in fatal crashes: An exploratory empirical analysis.
    Qin L; Li ZR; Chen Z; Andi Bill MS; Noyce DA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():23-31. PubMed ID: 31235232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Influence of Technology-Based Distracted Driving on Drivers' Infractions and Their Subsequent Impact on Traffic Accidents Severity.
    García-Herrero S; Febres JD; Boulagouas W; Gutiérrez JM; Mariscal Saldaña MÁ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34281092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of factors influencing aggressive driver behavior and crash involvement.
    Adavikottu A; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 34491872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploratory Development of Algorithms for Determining Driver Attention Status.
    Herbers E; Miller M; Neurauter L; Walters J; Glaser D
    Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 37732402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Young females at risk while driving with a small child.
    Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Summala H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():321-331. PubMed ID: 28942042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance.
    Ezzati Amini R; Al Haddad C; Batabyal D; Gkena I; De Vos B; Cuenen A; Brijs T; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107195. PubMed ID: 37441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions.
    Ebel P; Lingenfelder C; Vogelsang A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Apr; 183():106956. PubMed ID: 36681017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of vehicle crashes by drivers' characteristics and past traffic violations in Korea using a zero-inflated negative binomial model.
    Kim DH; Ramjan LM; Mak KK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 26043956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Child passengers and driver culpability in fatal crashes by driver gender.
    Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Pekkanen J; Summala H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 26507116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How is the duration of distraction related to safety-critical events? Harnessing naturalistic driving data to explore the role of driving instability.
    Ahmad N; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    J Safety Res; 2023 Jun; 85():15-30. PubMed ID: 37330865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Address inputting while driving: a comparison of four alternative text input methods on in-vehicle navigation displays usability and driver distraction.
    Zhong Q; Guo G; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(4):163-168. PubMed ID: 35319331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.