BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37330932)

  • 21. [Effect of testicular puncture biopsy on the success rate of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia].
    Mao JM; Liu DF; Zhao LM; Hong K; Zhang L; Ma LL; Jiang H; Qiao J
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Aug; 50(4):613-616. PubMed ID: 30122758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive factors for successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and a history of cryptorchidism.
    Chen XL; Wei YA; Ren XH; Zhang X; Li GY; Lu ZW; Zhang D; Qin C; Su SF
    Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(5):503-508. PubMed ID: 35042308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction for men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
    Klami R; Mankonen H; Perheentupa A
    Reprod Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(2):137-142. PubMed ID: 29602610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Severe testicular atrophy does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
    Bryson CF; Ramasamy R; Sheehan M; Palermo GD; Rosenwaks Z; Schlegel PN
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):175-8. PubMed ID: 23911635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Histological and immunohistochemical outcomes after microdissection TESE in contrast with hormonal profile, testis volume and genetics in patients with azoospermia.
    Arian I; Dumbraveanu I; Ghenciu V; Machidon D; Ernu I; Ceban E
    J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 36873127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Versus Multiple Needle-pass Percutaneous Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jensen CFS; Ohl DA; Fode M; Jørgensen N; Giwercman A; Bruun NH; Elenkov A; Klajnbard A; Andersen CY; Aksglaede L; Grøndahl ML; Bekker MC; Sønksen J
    Eur Urol; 2022 Oct; 82(4):377-384. PubMed ID: 35599183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Circulatory exosomal tRF-Glu-CTC-005 and tRF-Gly-GCC-002 serve as predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia.
    Zhang Q; Liu Z; Han X; Li Y; Xia T; Zhu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Hao L; Hu F; Cao Y; Han C; Zhu Z
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):512-521. PubMed ID: 34955241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Azoospermia Type Does Not Affect Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Results When Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Is Performed.
    Aydin T; Yücel B; Sofikerim M; Karadag M; Tokat F
    J Reprod Med; 2016; 61(11-12):581-4. PubMed ID: 30226717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of the use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in guiding microdissection testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia.
    Zhang S; Du J; Tian R; Xie S; Li F; Li Z
    BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):48. PubMed ID: 29792185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gonadotropins treatment prior to microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: a single-center cohort study.
    Peng T; Liao C; Ye X; Chen Z; Lan Y; Fu X; An G
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Apr; 20(1):61. PubMed ID: 35365173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predictors for successful sperm retrieval of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) following failed TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia patients.
    Xu T; Peng L; Lin X; Li J; Xu W
    Andrologia; 2017 May; 49(4):. PubMed ID: 27444399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia patients: a machine-learning perspective.
    Zeadna A; Khateeb N; Rokach L; Lior Y; Har-Vardi I; Harlev A; Huleihel M; Lunenfeld E; Levitas E
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 32538428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh testicular spermatozoa obtained on the day of or the day before oocyte collection and with cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with azoospermia.
    Karacan M; Alwaeely F; Erkan S; Çebi Z; Berberoğlugil M; Batukan M; Uluğ M; Arvas A; Çamlıbel T
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Oct; 100(4):975-80. PubMed ID: 23891272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE): Predictive value of preoperative hormonal levels and pathology in non-obstructive azoospermia.
    Eken A; Gulec F
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 34(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 29413225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Micro-TESE surgery combined with ICSI regimen in the treatment of non-obstructive azoospermia patients and its effect analysis.
    Wang K; Tang D; Zhu Q; Yang D; Yang H; Peng J; Ding D; Wang J; Wang Q; Cao Y; Chen B; Zhang Z
    Zygote; 2023 Feb; 31(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 36268556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intrasurgical parameters associated with successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
    Caroppo E; Castiglioni F; Campagna C; Colpi EM; Piatti E; Gazzano G; Colpi GM
    Andrology; 2021 Nov; 9(6):1864-1871. PubMed ID: 34289247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prediction model for obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
    Cissen M; Meijerink AM; D'Hauwers KW; Meissner A; van der Weide N; Mochtar MH; de Melker AA; Ramos L; Repping S; Braat DD; Fleischer K; van Wely M
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):1934-41. PubMed ID: 27406950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Live birth rate with repeat microdissection TESE and intracytoplasmic sperm injection after a conventional testicular biopsy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia.
    Karacan M; Ulug M; Arvas A; Cebi Z; Erkan S; Camlıbel T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():174-7. PubMed ID: 25461374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical comparison between conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia: Understanding which treatment works for which patient.
    Maglia E; Boeri L; Fontana M; Gallioli A; De Lorenzis E; Palmisano F; Zanetti S; Sampogna G; Restelli L; Somigliana E; Serrago M; Gadda F; Montanari E
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Jun; 90(2):130-135. PubMed ID: 29974723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differences in Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase1- (PARP1-) and Proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) Immunoreactivity in Patients Who Experienced Successful and Unsuccessful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Procedures.
    Akarsu S; Büke B; Gürgen SG; Akdemir S; Gode F; Biçer M; Tekindal MA; Isik AZ
    Urol J; 2017 Aug; 14(5):5018-5022. PubMed ID: 28853108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.