176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37331461)
1. Levonorgestrel intrauterine device use and incident idiopathic intracranial hypertension among commercially insured women.
De Lott LB; Moniz MH; Niziol LM; Khanna S; Musch DC; Cornblath WT
Contraception; 2023 Sep; 125():110089. PubMed ID: 37331461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 3-year multicentre randomized controlled trial of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants, with non-randomized matched copper-intrauterine device controls.
Bahamondes L; Brache V; Meirik O; Ali M; Habib N; Landoulsi S;
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2527-38. PubMed ID: 26409014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety of levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system compared to copper intrauterine device: a population-based cohort study.
Bosco-Lévy P; Gouverneur A; Langlade C; Miremont G; Pariente A
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):345-349. PubMed ID: 30871933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenstrual and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Suvisaari J; Lähteenmäki P
Contraception; 1996 Oct; 54(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 8922872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceptability of an experimental intracervical device: results of a study controlling for selection bias.
Shain RN; Ratsula K; Toivonen J; Lähteenmäki P; Luukkainen T; Holden AE; Rosenthal M
Contraception; 1989 Jan; 39(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 2491982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative Risk of Cervical Neoplasms Among Copper and Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Users.
Spotnitz ME; Natarajan K; Ryan PB; Westhoff CL
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 135(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 31923062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and continued use of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as compared with the copper intrauterine device among women living with HIV in South Africa: A randomized controlled trial.
Todd CS; Jones HE; Langwenya N; Hoover DR; Chen PL; Petro G; Myer L
PLoS Med; 2020 May; 17(5):e1003110. PubMed ID: 32442189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.
Sanders JN; Turok DK; Royer PA; Thompson IS; Gawron LM; Storck KE
Contraception; 2017 Aug; 96(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 28596121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. HIV incidence among women using intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, a copper intrauterine device, or a levonorgestrel implant for contraception: a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial.
Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) Trial Consortium
Lancet; 2019 Jul; 394(10195):303-313. PubMed ID: 31204114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a method of contraception with therapeutic properties.
Luukkainen T; Toivonen J
Contraception; 1995 Nov; 52(5):269-76. PubMed ID: 8585882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characteristics and hormonal contraception use patterns of levonorgestrel 13.5 mg intrauterine device users in Sweden 2014-2016.
Linder M; Schoendorf J; Pisa F; Schulze-Rath R; Cesta CE
Contraception; 2024 Mar; 131():110309. PubMed ID: 37844683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multicenter randomized clinical trial of etonogestrel and levonorgestrel contraceptive implants with nonrandomized copper intrauterine device controls: effect on weight variations up to 3 years after placement.
Bahamondes L; Brache V; Ali M; Habib N;
Contraception; 2018 Sep; 98(3):181-187. PubMed ID: 29777663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception.
Silva Dos Santos PN; Madden T; Omvig K; Peipert JF
Contraception; 2017 Apr; 95(4):382-389. PubMed ID: 28041992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.
Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25601352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hormonal intrauterine devices.
Rybo G; Andersson K; Odlind V
Ann Med; 1993 Apr; 25(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 8489751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
