These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37331752)

  • 1. Fluid-structure interaction study of hemodynamics and its biomechanical influence on carotid artery atherosclerotic plaque deposits.
    Oyejide AJ; Awonusi AA; Ige EO
    Med Eng Phys; 2023 Jul; 117():103998. PubMed ID: 37331752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of anesthesia and fluid-structure interaction on simulated shear stress patterns in the carotid bifurcation of mice.
    De Wilde D; Trachet B; De Meyer G; Segers P
    J Biomech; 2016 Sep; 49(13):2741-2747. PubMed ID: 27342001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Case Report: Evaluating Biomechanical Risk Factors in Carotid Stenosis by Patient-Specific Fluid-Structural Interaction Biomechanical Analysis.
    Wang J; Mendieta JB; Paritala PK; Xiang Y; Raffel OC; McGahan T; Lloyd T; Li Z
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021; 50(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 33744885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of atherosclerotic plaque location and severity to the near-wall hemodynamics of the carotid bifurcation: an experimental study and FSI modeling.
    Ahmadpour-B M; Nooraeen A; Tafazzoli-Shadpour M; Taghizadeh H
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2021 Jun; 20(3):1069-1085. PubMed ID: 33609192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemodynamic Factors Affecting Carotid Sinus Atherosclerotic Stenosis.
    Li CH; Gao BL; Wang JW; Liu JF; Li H; Yang ST
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 121():e262-e276. PubMed ID: 30261386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subject-Specific Fully-Coupled and One-Way Fluid-Structure Interaction Models for Modeling of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques in Humans.
    Tao X; Gao P; Jing L; Lin Y; Sui B
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 Oct; 21():3279-90. PubMed ID: 26510514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intracranial collateralization determines hemodynamic forces for carotid plaque disruption.
    Lal BK; Beach KW; Sumner DS
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 54(5):1461-71. PubMed ID: 21820834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of computational strategy on prediction of mechanical stress in carotid atherosclerotic plaques: comparison of 2D structure-only, 3D structure-only, one-way and fully coupled fluid-structure interaction analyses.
    Huang Y; Teng Z; Sadat U; Graves MJ; Bennett MR; Gillard JH
    J Biomech; 2014 Apr; 47(6):1465-71. PubMed ID: 24529358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A numerical study on hemodynamics in the left coronary bifurcation with normal and hypertension conditions.
    Bahrami S; Norouzi M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1785-1796. PubMed ID: 30027356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer simulation of local blood flow and vessel mechanics in a compliant carotid artery bifurcation model.
    Perktold K; Rappitsch G
    J Biomech; 1995 Jul; 28(7):845-56. PubMed ID: 7657682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic parameters distribution of upstream, stenosis center, and downstream sides of plaques in carotid artery with different stenosis: a MRI and CFD study.
    Sui B; Gao P; Lin Y; Jing L; Sun S; Qin H
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Mar; 56(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: implications for indicators of abnormal flow.
    Morbiducci U; Gallo D; Massai D; Consolo F; Ponzini R; Antiga L; Bignardi C; Deriu MA; Redaelli A
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Sep; 132(9):091005. PubMed ID: 20815639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D critical plaque wall stress is a better predictor of carotid plaque rupture sites than flow shear stress: An in vivo MRI-based 3D FSI study.
    Teng Z; Canton G; Yuan C; Ferguson M; Yang C; Huang X; Zheng J; Woodard PK; Tang D
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Mar; 132(3):031007. PubMed ID: 20459195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear stress metrics associated with pro-atherogenic high-risk anatomical features in a carotid artery bifurcation model.
    Zalud NC; Bulusu KV; Plesniak MW
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 May; 105():105956. PubMed ID: 37098301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of an Experimental and Digital Cardiovascular Arterial Model for Transient Hemodynamic and Postural Change Studies: "A Preliminary Framework Analysis".
    Hewlin RL; Kizito JP
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Mar; 9(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 29124548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sinus size and position on hemodynamics during pulsatile flow in a carotid artery bifurcation.
    Nagargoje M; Gupta R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Aug; 192():105440. PubMed ID: 32299026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational analysis of effects of external carotid artery flow and occlusion on adverse carotid bifurcation hemodynamics.
    Hyun S; Kleinstreuer C; Archie JP
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Jun; 37(6):1248-54. PubMed ID: 12764272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary artery plaque growth: A two-way coupled shear stress-driven model.
    Arzani A
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Jan; 36(1):e3293. PubMed ID: 31820589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MRI-based mechanical analysis of carotid atherosclerotic plaque using a material-property-mapping approach: A material-property-mapping method for plaque stress analysis.
    Mendieta JB; Fontanarosa D; Wang J; Paritala PK; Muller J; Lloyd T; Li Z
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Apr; 231():107417. PubMed ID: 36827823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of shear stress related parameters in the carotid bifurcation using mouse-specific FSI simulations.
    De Wilde D; Trachet B; Debusschere N; Iannaccone F; Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; De Meyer GRY; Segers P
    J Biomech; 2016 Jul; 49(11):2135-2142. PubMed ID: 26655592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.