116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37333366)
61. Image denoising by transfer learning of generative adversarial network for dental CT.
Hegazy MAA; Cho MH; Lee SY
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Sep; 6(5):055024. PubMed ID: 33444255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. DENOISING SWEPT SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY VOLUMETRIC SCANS USING A DEEP LEARNING MODEL.
Ledesma-Gil G; Mao Z; Liu J; Spaide RF
Retina; 2022 Mar; 42(3):450-455. PubMed ID: 35175017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Domain-adaptive denoising network for low-dose CT via noise estimation and transfer learning.
Wang J; Tang Y; Wu Z; Tsui BMW; Chen W; Yang X; Zheng J; Li M
Med Phys; 2023 Jan; 50(1):74-88. PubMed ID: 36018732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Framework for denoising Monte Carlo photon transport simulations using deep learning.
Ardakani MR; Yu L; Kaeli D; Fang Q
J Biomed Opt; 2022 May; 27(8):. PubMed ID: 35614533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Quantitative evaluation of deep convolutional neural network-based image denoising for low-dose computed tomography.
Usui K; Ogawa K; Goto M; Sakano Y; Kyougoku S; Daida H
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art; 2021 Jul; 4(1):21. PubMed ID: 34304321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Enhanced Visualization of Retinal Microvasculature in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging via Deep Learning.
Kadomoto S; Uji A; Muraoka Y; Akagi T; Tsujikawa A
J Clin Med; 2020 May; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 32370282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Wavelet subband-specific learning for low-dose computed tomography denoising.
Kim W; Lee J; Kang M; Kim JS; Choi JH
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274308. PubMed ID: 36084002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Real-time noise reduction based on ground truth free deep learning for optical coherence tomography.
Huang Y; Zhang N; Hao Q
Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Apr; 12(4):2027-2040. PubMed ID: 33996214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Disentangling Noise from Images: A Flow-Based Image Denoising Neural Network.
Liu Y; Anwar S; Qin Z; Ji P; Caldwell S; Gedeon T
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Dec; 22(24):. PubMed ID: 36560213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Performance of deep learning restoration methods for the extraction of particle dynamics in noisy microscopy image sequences.
Kefer P; Iqbal F; Locatelli M; Lawrimore J; Zhang M; Bloom K; Bonin K; Vidi PA; Liu J
Mol Biol Cell; 2021 Apr; 32(9):903-914. PubMed ID: 33502895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Low-Dose CT Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network With Wasserstein Distance and Perceptual Loss.
Yang Q; Yan P; Zhang Y; Yu H; Shi Y; Mou X; Kalra MK; Zhang Y; Sun L; Wang G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1348-1357. PubMed ID: 29870364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Feasibility of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using deep learning reconstruction based on the deep learning denoising technique.
Tanabe M; Higashi M; Yonezawa T; Yamaguchi T; Iida E; Furukawa M; Okada M; Shinoda K; Ito K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jul; 80():121-126. PubMed ID: 33971240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.
Zhou Z; Gong H; Hsieh S; McCollough CH; Yu L
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38555876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Improving phase-based conductivity reconstruction by means of deep learning-based denoising of
Jung KJ; Mandija S; Kim JH; Ryu K; Jung S; Cui C; Kim SY; Park M; van den Berg CAT; Kim DH
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2084-2094. PubMed ID: 33949721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. De-noising of SPECT images via optimal thresholding by wavelets.
Noubari HA; Fayazi A; Babapour F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():352-5. PubMed ID: 19963711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Denoising of MR images with Rician noise using a wider neural network and noise range division.
You X; Cao N; Lu H; Mao M; Wanga W
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Dec; 64():154-159. PubMed ID: 31220567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Denoising Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Data Using Stacked Autoencoder for Improving Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speed of MRS.
Wang J; Ji B; Lei Y; Liu T; Mao H; Yang X
ArXiv; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 37033456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. RepE: unsupervised representation learning for image enhancement in nonlinear optical microscopy.
Jhang YJ; Lin X; Chia SH; Chen WC; Wu IC; Wu MT; Zhuo GY; Tai TM; Chen HW
Opt Lett; 2023 Aug; 48(16):4245-4248. PubMed ID: 37582003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. An unsupervised two-step training framework for low-dose computed tomography denoising.
Kim W; Lee J; Choi JH
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1127-1144. PubMed ID: 37432026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Improved cortical surface reconstruction using sub-millimeter resolution MPRAGE by image denoising.
Tian Q; Zaretskaya N; Fan Q; Ngamsombat C; Bilgic B; Polimeni JR; Huang SY
Neuroimage; 2021 Jun; 233():117946. PubMed ID: 33711484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
