These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3733385)

  • 1. A digital radiographic imaging system for mammography.
    Fritz SL; Chang CH; Gupta NK; Martin NL; Laws RL; Anderson WH; Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW; Bernardi R; Fox T
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Jul; 21(7):581-3. PubMed ID: 3733385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundamentals of digital mammography: physics, technology and practical considerations.
    Smith A
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):18-24, 26-31; quiz 32-4. PubMed ID: 14603590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast CT.
    Glick SJ
    Annu Rev Biomed Eng; 2007; 9():501-26. PubMed ID: 17506654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs.
    Williams MB; Fajardo LL
    Acad Radiol; 1996 May; 3(5):429-37. PubMed ID: 8796697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Ultra-high-strip-density grids for mammography: an alternative to grid mammography?].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1986 May; 144(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 3012683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography with synchrotron radiation.
    Burattini E; Cossu E; Di Maggio C; Gambaccini M; Indovina PL; Marziani M; Pocek M; Simeoni S; Simonetti G
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):239-44. PubMed ID: 7892478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study.
    Chen B; Ning R
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):755-70. PubMed ID: 12033572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the impact of X-ray spectral shape on image quality in flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Glick SJ; Thacker S; Gong X; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 17278485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comments on the article "Focus measurement and geometric lack of focus in mammography equipment"].
    Andersson O
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Nov; 4(6):351-2. PubMed ID: 7819303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D ultrasound computer tomography of the breast: a new era?
    Ruiter NV; Zapf M; Hopp T; Dapp R; Kretzek E; Birk M; Kohout B; Gemmeke H
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S133-4. PubMed ID: 23083562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
    Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
    Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grating-based darkfield imaging of human breast tissue.
    Anton G; Bayer F; Beckmann MW; Durst J; Fasching PA; Haas W; Hartmann A; Michel T; Pelzer G; Radicke M; Rauh C; Rieger J; Ritter A; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Wachter DL; Weber T; Wenkel E; Wucherer L
    Z Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 23(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23380071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA; Webster EW; Kalisher L
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Focal spot sizes in dual-track Mo and Rh target mammographic X-ray tubes.
    Law J; Robinson A; Underwood AC
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 69(827):1077-8. PubMed ID: 8958034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical results of digital mammography].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Bautz W
    Radiologe; 2005 Mar; 45(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 15744483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of roentgen exposure in mammography. I. Six views.
    Gilbertson JD; Randall MG; Fingerhut AG
    Radiology; 1970 May; 95(2):383-94. PubMed ID: 5439448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.