148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37334746)
1. Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose-mimicking optimization.
Maes D; Holmstrom M; Helander R; Saini J; Fang C; Bowen SR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 24(10):e14065. PubMed ID: 37334746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A hybrid optimization strategy for deliverable intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan generation using deep learning-based dose prediction.
Sun Z; Xia X; Fan J; Zhao J; Zhang K; Wang J; Hu W
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1344-1356. PubMed ID: 35043971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attention-aware 3D U-Net convolutional neural network for knowledge-based planning 3D dose distribution prediction of head-and-neck cancer.
Osman AFI; Tamam NM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13630. PubMed ID: 35533234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advanced pencil beam scanning Bragg peak FLASH-RT delivery technique can enhance lung cancer planning treatment outcomes compared to conventional multiple-energy proton PBS techniques.
Wei S; Lin H; Isabelle Choi J; Shi C; Simone CB; Kang M
Radiother Oncol; 2022 Oct; 175():238-247. PubMed ID: 35961583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Machine learning-based automatic proton therapy planning: Impact of post-processing and dose-mimicking in plan robustness.
Borderias-Villarroel E; Huet Dastarac M; Barragán-Montero AM; Helander R; Holmstrom M; Geets X; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4480-4490. PubMed ID: 37029632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated Robust Planning for IMPT in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning.
van Bruggen IG; Huiskes M; de Vette SPM; Holmström M; Langendijk JA; Both S; Kierkels RGJ; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1283-1290. PubMed ID: 36535432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward automatic beam angle selection for pencil-beam scanning proton liver treatments: A deep learning-based approach.
Kaderka R; Liu KC; Liu L; VanderStraeten R; Liu TL; Lee KM; Tu YE; MacEwan I; Simpson D; Urbanic J; Chang C
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4293-4304. PubMed ID: 35488864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beam mask and sliding window-facilitated deep learning-based accurate and efficient dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Zhang L; Holmes JM; Liu Z; Vora SA; Sio TT; Vargas CE; Yu NY; Keole SR; Schild SE; Bues M; Li S; Liu T; Shen J; Wong WW; Liu W
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1484-1498. PubMed ID: 37748037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization.
Renaud MA; Serban M; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1384-1396. PubMed ID: 30628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer.
Møller DS; Poulsen PR; Hagner A; Dufour M; Nordsmark M; Nyeng TB; Mortensen HR; Lutz CM; Hoffmann L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Oct; 111(2):539-548. PubMed ID: 33974885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep learning prediction of proton and photon dose distributions for paediatric abdominal tumours.
Guerreiro F; Seravalli E; Janssens GO; Maduro JH; Knopf AC; Langendijk JA; Raaymakers BW; Kontaxis C
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Mar; 156():36-42. PubMed ID: 33264639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robust automated radiation therapy treatment planning using scenario-specific dose prediction and robust dose mimicking.
Eriksson O; Zhang T
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3564-3573. PubMed ID: 35305023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Planning Comparison of IMRT vs. Pencil Beam Scanning for Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Lung Cancers.
Mah D; Yorke E; Zemanaj E; Han Z; Liu H; George J; Lambiase J; Czmielewski C; Lovelock DM; Rimner A; Shepherd AF
Med Dosim; 2022 Spring; 47(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 34426041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
