137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37334789)
1. Hertel-exophthalmometry-like multi-detector-row-CT-exophthalmometry: inter-disciplinary inter-observer reproducibility of measurements.
Muller-Lisse UG; Garip-Kuebler A; Murer S; Fuchsgruber F; Braeuninger C; Flatz W; Priglinger S; Hintschich C; Klingenstein A
Br J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 96(1148):20211408. PubMed ID: 37334789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed exophthalmometry is an accurate and reproducible method for the measuring of eyeballs' protrusion.
Afanasyeva DS; Gushchina MB; Gerasimov MY; Borzenok SA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):461-465. PubMed ID: 29325888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hertel exophthalmometry versus computed tomography and optical 3D imaging for the determination of the globe position in zygomatic fractures.
Nkenke E; Maier T; Benz M; Wiltfang J; Holbach LM; Kramer M; Häusler G; Neukam FW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 33(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 15050067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation of Hertel exophthalmometry.
Lam AK; Lam CF; Leung WK; Hung PK
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 19523092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hertel exophthalmometry: reliability and interobserver variation.
Kashkouli MB; Beigi B; Noorani MM; Nojoomi M
Orbit; 2003 Dec; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 14685897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-sectional computed tomography assessment of exophthalmos in comparison to clinical measurement via Hertel exophthalmometry.
Klingenstein A; Samel C; Garip-Kübler A; Hintschich C; Müller-Lisse UG
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11973. PubMed ID: 35831406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proptosis--Correlation and Agreement between Hertel Exophthalmometry and Computed Tomography.
Ramli N; Kala S; Samsudin A; Rahmat K; Abidin ZZ
Orbit; 2015; 34(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26186249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Value of Multidetector Computed Tomography of Orbits in Globe Protrusion in Comparison to Hertel Exophthalmometry.
Đorić I; Žarković M; Radojičić Z; Repac N; Janićijević A; Rotim K; Tasić G; Rasulić L
Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Mar; 56(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 29120123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilizing a mobile platform to obtain quantitative measurements of exophthalmos.
Magazin M; Tran AQ; Tooley AA
Orbit; 2022 Oct; 41(5):591-597. PubMed ID: 34542003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative en- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography.
Nkenke E; Benz M; Maier T; Wiltfang J; Holbach LM; Kramer M; Häusler G; Neukam FW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 31(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 14637065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of 3 exophthalmometers and computed tomographic biometry.
Delmas J; Loustau JM; Martin S; Bourmault L; Adenis JP; Robert PY
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 29108394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of exophthalmos measurements: Hertel exophthalmometer versus orbital parameters in 2-dimensional computed tomography.
Choi KJ; Lee MJ
Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 53(4):384-390. PubMed ID: 30119794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of exophthalmos measurement and the exophthalmometry value distribution in a healthy Dutch population and in Graves' patients. An exploratory study.
Mourits MP; Lombardo SH; van der Sluijs FA; Fenton S
Orbit; 2004 Sep; 23(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 15545129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of unilateral and simultaneous bilateral measurement of the globe position, using the Hertel exophthalmometer.
Ameri H; Fenton S
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 20(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 15599245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed Tomography Measurements as a Standard of Exophthalmos? Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Techniques.
Guo J; Qian J; Yuan Y
Curr Eye Res; 2018 May; 43(5):647-653. PubMed ID: 29377729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Naugle and Hertel instruments.
Cole HP; Couvillion JT; Fink AJ; Haik BG; Kastl PR
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Sep; 13(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9306438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Measurement Methods of Exophthalmos and Its Forensic Significance].
Tan SL; Chen JM; Yu XY; Wang MW; Zhuo PP; Zhou S; Xia WT
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 33(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 29219263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normal values of hertel exophthalmometry in children, teenagers, and adults from Tehran, Iran.
Kashkouli MB; Nojomi M; Parvaresh MM; Sanjari MS; Modarres M; Noorani MM
Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(10):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18832980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exophthalmometry values of Turkish adult population and the effect of age, sex, refractive status, and Hertel base values on Hertel readings.
Beden U; Ozarslan Y; Oztürk HE; Sönmez B; Erkan D; Oge I
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 18320506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Luedde and Hertel exophthalmometers.
Chang AA; Bank A; Francis IC; Kappagoda MB
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 23(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 11980078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
