These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37334802)

  • 1. Healthcare priority-setting criteria and social values in Iran: an investigation of local evidence.
    Goudarzi Z; Bijlmakers L; Nouhi M; Jahangiri R; Heydari M; Simangolwa W; Hakimzadeh SM; Jara KT
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2023 Jun; 39(1):e37. PubMed ID: 37334802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness.
    Baltussen R; Jansen MP; Mikkelsen E; Tromp N; Hontelez J; Bijlmakers L; Van der Wilt GJ
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2016 Nov; 5(11):615-618. PubMed ID: 27801355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the landscape of health technology assessment in Iran: perspectives from stakeholders on needs, demand and supply.
    Aryankhesal A; Behzadifar M; Bakhtiari A; Shahabi S; Azari S; Darvishi Teli B; Rezapour A; Ehsanzadeh SJ; Behzadifar M
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2024 Jan; 22(1):11. PubMed ID: 38225573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social values and health priority setting in Australia: an analysis applied to the context of health technology assessment.
    Whitty JA; Littlejohns P
    Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 119(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 25267072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.
    Uzochukwu BSC; Okeke C; O'Brien N; Ruiz F; Sombie I; Hollingworth S
    Global Health; 2020 Jul; 16(1):58. PubMed ID: 32641066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health technology assessment for sexual reproductive health and rights benefits package design in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review of evidence-informed deliberative processes.
    Simangolwa WM; Mbonigaba J; Govender K
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0306042. PubMed ID: 38935794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges in institutionalizing evidence-informed priority setting for health service packages: a qualitative document and interview analysis from Iran.
    Sajadi HS; Safikhani H; Olyaeemanesh A; Majdzadeh R
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2024 Aug; 22(1):110. PubMed ID: 39160569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Which Social Values Are Considered in Iranian Health System?
    Rashidian A; Arab M; Vaez Mahdavi M; Ashtarian K; Mostafavi H
    Arch Iran Med; 2018 May; 21(5):199-207. PubMed ID: 29738263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review.
    Grill C
    Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Oct; 7(1):75. PubMed ID: 34715932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Social values and healthcare priority setting in Korea.
    Ahn J; Kim G; Suh HS; Lee SM
    J Health Organ Manag; 2012; 26(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 22852456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research funding impact and priority setting - advancing universal access and quality healthcare research in Malaysia.
    Fun WH; Sararaks S; Tan EH; Tang KF; Chong DWQ; Low LL; Sapian RA; Ismail SA; Govind SK; Mahmud SH; Murad S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 19(1):248. PubMed ID: 31018843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Priority setting and implementation in a centralized health system: a case study of Kerman province in Iran.
    Khayatzadeh-Mahani A; Fotaki M; Harvey G
    Health Policy Plan; 2013 Aug; 28(5):480-94. PubMed ID: 23002248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment and prioritization of the WHO "best buys" and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in Iran.
    Bakhtiari A; Takian A; Majdzadeh R; Haghdoost AA
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Mar; 20(1):333. PubMed ID: 32171267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic effects of priority setting in healthcare: a scoping review of current evidence.
    Leskelä RL; Vanhala A; Gehrmann K; Haapatalo E; Ranta J; Patja K; Kousa I; Tapanainen P; Mika P; Tikkinen K; Ignatius E; Ojanen T; Torkki P
    BMJ Open; 2024 Nov; 14(11):e086342. PubMed ID: 39557552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.
    Putrik P; Jessup R; Buchbinder R; Glasziou P; Karnon J; O Connor DA
    Aust Health Rev; 2021 Aug; 45(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 33731250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of priority setting studies in health research in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
    Badakhshan A; Arab M; Rashidian A; Gholipour M; Mohebbi E; Zendehdel K
    East Mediterr Health J; 2018 Oct; 24(8):753-769. PubMed ID: 30328606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fair Processes for Priority Setting: Putting Theory into Practice Comment on "Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy".
    Jansen MP; Helderman JK; Boer B; Baltussen R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2017 Jan; 6(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 28005541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
    Aidem JM
    Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):683-690. PubMed ID: 28433324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.