144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37337238)
1. PYloroplasty versus No Intervention in GAstric REmnant REconstruction after Oesophagectomy: study protocol for the PYNI-GAREREO phase III randomized controlled trial.
Okada N; Kinoshita Y; Nishihara S; Kurotaki T; Sato A; Kimura K; Kushiya H; Umemoto K; Furukawa S; Yamabuki T; Takada M; Kato K; Ambo Y; Nakamura F
Trials; 2023 Jun; 24(1):412. PubMed ID: 37337238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial.
van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C
Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pyloric drainage (pyloroplasty) or no drainage in gastric reconstruction after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Young JE; Miller JD; Bennett WF
Dig Surg; 2002; 19(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 12119515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The CARDIA-trial protocol: a multinational, prospective, randomized, clinical trial comparing transthoracic esophagectomy with transhiatal extended gastrectomy in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) type II.
Leers JM; Knepper L; van der Veen A; Schröder W; Fuchs H; Schiller P; Hellmich M; Zettelmeyer U; Brosens LAA; Quaas A; Ruurda JP; van Hillegersberg R; Bruns CJ
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):781. PubMed ID: 32819399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer--the ROMIO (Randomized Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) study: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Avery KN; Metcalfe C; Berrisford R; Barham CP; Donovan JL; Elliott J; Falk SJ; Goldin R; Hanna G; Hollowood AA; Krysztopik R; Noble S; Sanders G; Streets CG; Titcomb DR; Wheatley T; Blazeby JM
Trials; 2014 Jun; 15():200. PubMed ID: 24888266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Chemical Pyloroplasty Necessary for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy?
Stewart CL; Wilson L; Hamm A; Bartsch C; Boniface M; Gleisner A; Mitchell JD; Weyant MJ; Meguid R; Gajdos C; Edil BH; McCarter M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1414-1418. PubMed ID: 28058546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Pyloroplasty on Gastric Conduit Emptying and Patients' Quality of Life After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
De Pasqual CA; Weindelmayer J; Gobbi L; Alberti L; Veltri A; Giacopuzzi S; de Manzoni G
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Jun; 31(6):692-697. PubMed ID: 32898448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Overall morbidity after total minimally invasive keyhole oesophagectomy versus hybrid oesophagectomy (the MICkey trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Klotz R; Diener MK; Schmidt T; Hackert T; Graf S; Fuchs HF; Grimminger P; Egberts JH; Gockel I; van der Sluis PC; Doerr-Harim C; Klose C; Feißt M; Mihaljevic AL
Trials; 2023 Mar; 24(1):175. PubMed ID: 36899404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy without pyloroplasty: analysis of 109 cases.
Nguyen NT; Dholakia C; Nguyen XM; Reavis K
Am Surg; 2010 Oct; 76(10):1135-8. PubMed ID: 21105628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The efficacy of pyloroplasty affecting to oral-intake quality of life using reconstruction with gastric tube post esophagectomy].
Kobayashi A; Ide H; Eguchi R; Nakamura T; Hayashi K; Hanyu F
Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 44(6):770-8. PubMed ID: 8753085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Should a pyloroplasty be carried out in stomach transposition after subtotal esophagectomy with esophago-gastric anastomosis at the neck? A prospective randomized study].
Zieren HU; Müller JM; Jacobi CA; Pichlmaier H
Chirurg; 1995 Apr; 66(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 7634942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pyloroplasty and pyloromyotomy in gastric replacement of the esophagus after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Law S; Cheung MC; Fok M; Chu KM; Wong J
J Am Coll Surg; 1997 Jun; 184(6):630-6. PubMed ID: 9179120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Berlth F; Poplawski A; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Müller-Stich BP; Ruurda JP; Schiesser M; Schneider PM; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1060. PubMed ID: 34565343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Cuesta MA; Daams F; Roig Garcia J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Ann Surg; 2017 Aug; 266(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 28187044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing open and minimally invasive surgical procedures for oesophagectomy in the treatment of cancer: the ROMIO (Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open) feasibility study and pilot trial.
Metcalfe C; Avery K; Berrisford R; Barham P; Noble SM; Fernandez AM; Hanna G; Goldin R; Elliott J; Wheatley T; Sanders G; Hollowood A; Falk S; Titcomb D; Streets C; Donovan JL; Blazeby JM
Health Technol Assess; 2016 Jun; 20(48):1-68. PubMed ID: 27373720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The esophageal remnant after gastric interposition.
D'Journo XB; Martin J; Ferraro P; Duranceau A
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):377-88. PubMed ID: 18564166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized Comparison of Gastric Tube Reconstruction With and Without Duodenal Diversion Plus Roux-en-Y Anastomosis After Esophagectomy.
Yano M; Sugimura K; Miyata H; Motoori M; Tanaka K; Omori T; Ohue M; Sakon M
Ann Surg; 2020 Jul; 272(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 31415003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
