191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37337418)
1. Conditional inference in cis-Mendelian randomization using weak genetic factors.
Patel A; Gill D; Newcombe P; Burgess S
Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3458-3471. PubMed ID: 37337418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.
Minică CC; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; de Geus E; Neale MC
Behav Genet; 2018 Jul; 48(4):337-349. PubMed ID: 29882082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TwoStepCisMR: A Novel Method and R Package for Attenuating Bias in
Woolf B; Zagkos L; Gill D
Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 36140709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.
Rees JMB; Wood AM; Burgess S
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(29):4705-4718. PubMed ID: 28960498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statistical methods for cis-Mendelian randomization with two-sample summary-level data.
Gkatzionis A; Burgess S; Newcombe PJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 47(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 36273411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Weak and pleiotropy robust sex-stratified Mendelian randomization in the one sample and two sample settings.
Karageorgiou V; Tyrrell J; Mckinley TJ; Bowden J
Genet Epidemiol; 2023 Mar; 47(2):135-151. PubMed ID: 36682072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.
Bowden J; Davey Smith G; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):512-25. PubMed ID: 26050253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weak-instrument robust tests in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization.
Wang S; Kang H
Biometrics; 2022 Dec; 78(4):1699-1713. PubMed ID: 34213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disentangling the effects of traits with shared clustered genetic predictors using multivariable Mendelian randomization.
Batool F; Patel A; Gill D; Burgess S
Genet Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 46(7):415-429. PubMed ID: 35638254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.
Grant AJ; Burgess S
Biostatistics; 2022 Apr; 23(2):609-625. PubMed ID: 33155035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing and correcting for weak and pleiotropic instruments in two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization.
Sanderson E; Spiller W; Bowden J
Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(25):5434-5452. PubMed ID: 34338327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data.
Burgess S; Butterworth A; Thompson SG
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):658-65. PubMed ID: 24114802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multivariable Mendelian Randomization and Mediation.
Sanderson E
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med; 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 32341063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.
Davies NM; von Hinke Kessler Scholder S; Farbmacher H; Burgess S; Windmeijer F; Smith GD
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 25382280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
