192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37337692)
1. Inferring the distributions of fitness effects and proportions of strongly deleterious mutations.
Charmouh AP; Bocedi G; Hartfield M
G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 37337692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inferring Parameters of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations When Beneficial Mutations Are Strongly Advantageous and Rare.
Booker TR
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jul; 10(7):2317-2326. PubMed ID: 32371451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.
Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):345-361. PubMed ID: 28249985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inferring the distribution of mutational effects on fitness in Drosophila.
Loewe L; Charlesworth B
Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 17148422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comprehensive model of mutations affecting fitness and inferences for Arabidopsis thaliana.
Shaw FH; Geyer CJ; Shaw RG
Evolution; 2002 Mar; 56(3):453-63. PubMed ID: 11989677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in deleterious mutational effects in Drosophila melanogaster: combining quantitative and population genetic insights.
Ruzicka F; Connallon T; Reuter M
Genetics; 2021 Nov; 219(3):. PubMed ID: 34740242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inferring the distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Böndel KB; Kraemer SA; Samuels T; McClean D; Lachapelle J; Ness RW; Colegrave N; Keightley PD
PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000192. PubMed ID: 31242179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triallelic Population Genomics for Inferring Correlated Fitness Effects of Same Site Nonsynonymous Mutations.
Ragsdale AP; Coffman AJ; Hsieh P; Struck TJ; Gutenkunst RN
Genetics; 2016 May; 203(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 27029732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. polyDFE: Inferring the Distribution of Fitness Effects and Properties of Beneficial Mutations from Polymorphism Data.
Tataru P; Bataillon T
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():125-146. PubMed ID: 31975166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Full Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Amino Acid Mutations Across Great Apes.
Castellano D; Macià MC; Tataru P; Bataillon T; Munch K
Genetics; 2019 Nov; 213(3):953-966. PubMed ID: 31488516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans.
Eyre-Walker A; Woolfit M; Phelps T
Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):891-900. PubMed ID: 16547091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interference Effects of Deleterious and Beneficial Mutations in Large Asexual Populations.
Jain K
Genetics; 2019 Apr; 211(4):1357-1369. PubMed ID: 30700529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dynamics of adaptation on correlated fitness landscapes.
Kryazhimskiy S; Tkacik G; Plotkin JB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Nov; 106(44):18638-43. PubMed ID: 19858497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta's Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?
Chen J; Glémin S; Lascoux M
Genetics; 2020 Apr; 214(4):1005-1018. PubMed ID: 32015019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitness effects of derived deleterious mutations in four closely related wild tomato species with spatial structure.
Tellier A; Fischer I; Merino C; Xia H; Camus-Kulandaivelu L; Städler T; Stephan W
Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Sep; 107(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 21245893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.
Keightley PD; Eyre-Walker A
Genetics; 2007 Dec; 177(4):2251-61. PubMed ID: 18073430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of non-neutral synonymous mutations when inferring selection on non-synonymous mutations.
Zurita AMI; Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.
Schneider A; Charlesworth B; Eyre-Walker A; Keightley PD
Genetics; 2011 Dec; 189(4):1427-37. PubMed ID: 21954160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.
Bataillon T; Bailey SF
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 24891070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
