BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37337692)

  • 21. Fitness Effects of Mutations: An Assessment of PROVEAN Predictions Using Mutation Accumulation Data.
    Sandell L; Sharp NP
    Genome Biol Evol; 2022 Jan; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 35038732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mutation and Selection Induce Correlations between Selection Coefficients and Mutation Rates.
    Gitschlag BL; Cano AV; Payne JL; McCandlish DM; Stoltzfus A
    Am Nat; 2023 Oct; 202(4):534-557. PubMed ID: 37792926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Constraining models of dominance for nonsynonymous mutations in the human genome.
    Kyriazis CC; Lohmueller KE
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38463985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spontaneous single-nucleotide substitutions and microsatellite mutations have distinct distributions of fitness effects.
    Plavskin Y; de Biase MS; Ziv N; Janská L; Zhu YO; Hall DW; Schwarz RF; Tranchina D; Siegal ML
    bioRxiv; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37461506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spontaneous single-nucleotide substitutions and microsatellite mutations have distinct distributions of fitness effects.
    Plavskin Y; de Biase MS; Ziv N; Janská L; Zhu YO; Hall DW; Schwarz RF; Tranchina D; Siegal ML
    PLoS Biol; 2024 Jul; 22(7):e3002698. PubMed ID: 38950062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The dynamics of adapting, unregulated populations and a modified fundamental theorem.
    O'Dwyer JP
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Jan; 10(78):20120538. PubMed ID: 22993247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of the fitness effect of compensatory mutations.
    Zhang L; Watson LT
    HFSP J; 2009; 3(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19649156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. fastDFE: Fast and Flexible Inference of the Distribution of Fitness Effects.
    Sendrowski J; Bataillon T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 May; 41(5):. PubMed ID: 38577958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genotype by random environmental interactions gives an advantage to non-favored minor alleles.
    Mahdipour-Shirayeh A; Darooneh AH; Long AD; Komarova NL; Kohandel M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5193. PubMed ID: 28701726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Resolving Deleterious and Near-Neutral Effects Requires Different Pooled Fitness Assay Designs.
    Limdi A; Baym M
    J Mol Evol; 2023 Jun; 91(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 37160452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modelling the evolution of genetic instability during tumour progression.
    S Datta R; Gutteridge A; Swanton C; Maley CC; Graham TA
    Evol Appl; 2013 Jan; 6(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 23396531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating the distribution of fitness effects from DNA sequence data: implications for the molecular clock.
    Piganeau G; Eyre-Walker A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Sep; 100(18):10335-40. PubMed ID: 12925735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying the fraction of new mutations that are recessive lethal.
    Wade EE; Kyriazis CC; Cavassim MIA; Lohmueller KE
    Evolution; 2023 Jun; 77(7):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 37074880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inferring Parameters of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations When Beneficial Mutations Are Strongly Advantageous and Rare.
    Booker TR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jul; 10(7):2317-2326. PubMed ID: 32371451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples.
    Kim BY; Huber CD; Lohmueller KE
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):345-361. PubMed ID: 28249985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inference of Distribution of Fitness Effects and Proportion of Adaptive Substitutions from Polymorphism Data.
    Tataru P; Mollion M; Glémin S; Bataillon T
    Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 28951530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.
    Bataillon T; Bailey SF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 24891070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.
    Charlesworth B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Feb; 112(6):1662-9. PubMed ID: 25572964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inferring the distributions of fitness effects and proportions of strongly deleterious mutations.
    Charmouh AP; Bocedi G; Hartfield M
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Aug; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 37337692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.