These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37338430)

  • 1. Feature intertrial priming biases attentional priority: Evidence from the capture-probe paradigm.
    Wirth BE; Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1145-1157. PubMed ID: 37338430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.
    Lerebourg M; de Lange FP; Peelen MV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Sep; 49(9):1236-1255. PubMed ID: 37410402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.
    van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):422-438. PubMed ID: 37258897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
    Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging impairs reactive attentional control but not proactive distractor inhibition.
    Kim AJ; Senior J; Chu S; Mather M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1938-1959. PubMed ID: 38780565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking the misallocation and reallocation of spatial attention towards auditory stimuli.
    Mandal A; Liesefeld AM; Liesefeld HR
    J Neurosci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distractor suppression leads to reduced flanker interference.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Feb; 83(2):624-636. PubMed ID: 33269439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is the Role of Spatial Attention in Statistical Learning During Visual Search?
    Golan A; Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Cogn; 2024; 7(1):52. PubMed ID: 39005952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attractiveness of salient distractors to reaching movements is task dependent.
    Nissens T; Fiehler K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2502-2515. PubMed ID: 32026449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of individual differences in distractor suppression driven by statistical learning.
    Ivanov Y; Theeuwes J; Bogaerts L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2437-2451. PubMed ID: 37491558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty-modulated attentional capture: Outcome variance increases attentional priority.
    Pearson D; Chong A; Chow JYL; Garner KG; Theeuwes J; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jun; 153(6):1628-1643. PubMed ID: 38695800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Adv Cogn Psychol; 2017; 13(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 28439320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional capture alters feature perception.
    Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1443-1454. PubMed ID: 31464467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative contributions of oculomotor capture and disengagement to distractor-related dwell times in visual search.
    Stefani M; Sauter M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16676. PubMed ID: 37794059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.
    Gaspelin N; Gaspar JM; Luck SJ
    Vis cogn; 2019; 27(3-4):227-246. PubMed ID: 31745389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search.
    Won BY; Forloines M; Zhou Z; Geng JJ
    Cortex; 2020 Nov; 132():309-321. PubMed ID: 33010740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Target templates and the time course of distractor location learning.
    Hanne AA; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1672. PubMed ID: 36717593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.