These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37340148)

  • 1. Repeated measures of mammographic density and texture to evaluate prediction and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature.
    Anandarajah A; Chen Y; Stoll C; Hardi A; Jiang S; Colditz GA
    Cancer Causes Control; 2023 Nov; 34(11):939-948. PubMed ID: 37340148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature.
    Anandarajah A; Chen Y; Colditz GA; Hardi A; Stoll C; Jiang S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2022 Dec; 24(1):101. PubMed ID: 36585732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
    Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic texture and risk of breast cancer by tumor type and estrogen receptor status.
    Malkov S; Shepherd JA; Scott CG; Tamimi RM; Ma L; Bertrand KA; Couch F; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Fan B; Norman A; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM; Kerlikowske K
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Dec; 18(1):122. PubMed ID: 27923387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic density, endocrine therapy and breast cancer risk: a prognostic and predictive biomarker review.
    Atakpa EC; Thorat MA; Cuzick J; Brentnall AR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Oct; 10(10):CD013091. PubMed ID: 34697802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
    Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk stratification of women with false-positive test results in mammography screening based on mammographic morphology and density: A case control study.
    Winkel RR; Euler-Chelpin MV; Lynge E; Diao P; Lillholm M; Kallenberg M; Forman JL; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Nielsen M; Vejborg I
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():53-60. PubMed ID: 28558329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel and fully automated mammographic texture analysis for risk prediction: results from two case-control studies.
    Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 19(1):114. PubMed ID: 29047382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
    Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Area and volumetric density estimation in processed full-field digital mammograms for risk assessment of breast cancer.
    Cheddad A; Czene K; Eriksson M; Li J; Easton D; Hall P; Humphreys K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110690. PubMed ID: 25329322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-automated and fully automated mammographic density measurement and breast cancer risk prediction.
    Llobet R; Pollán M; Antón J; Miranda-García J; Casals M; Martínez I; Ruiz-Perales F; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Pérez-Cortés JC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24636804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association and Prediction Utilizing Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique View Digital Mammography and Long-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Chen S; Tamimi RM; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2023 Sep; 16(9):531-537. PubMed ID: 37428020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
    Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.