292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37341006)
1. Comparing dusting and fragmenting efficiency using the new SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser versus a 120 W Holmium:YAG laser.
Chew BH; Koo KC; Halawani A; Lundeen CJ; Knudsen BE; Molina WR
Investig Clin Urol; 2023 May; 64(3):265-271. PubMed ID: 37341006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Superpulse Thulium Fiber Laser
Jiang P; Okhunov Z; Afyouni AS; Ali S; Hosseini Sharifi SH; Bhatt R; Brevik A; Ayad M; Larson K; Osann K; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2023 Mar; 37(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 36401505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG).
Molina WR; Carrera RV; Chew BH; Knudsen BE
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3951-3956. PubMed ID: 33604733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.
Hardy LA; Vinnichenko V; Fried NM
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Aug; 51(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 30648761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SuperPulsed Thulium fiber laser: The ultimate laser for lithotripsy?
Keller EX; Traxer O
Arch Esp Urol; 2020 Oct; 73(8):767-776. PubMed ID: 33025921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulse modulation with Moses technology improves popcorn laser lithotripsy.
Black KM; Aldoukhi AH; Teichman JMH; Majdalany SE; Hall TL; Roberts WW; Ghani KR
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1699-1705. PubMed ID: 32506386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison Between Holmium:YAG Laser with MOSES Technology vs Thulium Fiber Laser Lithotripsy in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Kidney Stones in Adults: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis From the FLEXible Ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry.
Castellani D; Fong KY; Lim EJ; Chew BH; Tailly T; Emiliani E; Teoh JY; Chai CA; Heng CT; Ong Lay Keat W; Tanidir Y; Ragoori D; Galosi AB; Singh A; Bin Hamri S; Traxer O; Somani BK; Gauhar V
J Urol; 2023 Aug; 210(2):323-330. PubMed ID: 37126223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Retrograde intrarenal surgery using a 1.94 m superpulsed thulium fiber laser].
Klimov RE; Lekarev VY; Tsarichenko DG; Dymov AM; Akopyan GN; Chinenov DV; Korolev DO; Ali SH; Gerasimov AN; Rapoport LM; Glybochko PV
Urologiia; 2021 Mar; (1):28-32. PubMed ID: 33818931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9.
Jiang P; Peta A; Brevik A; Arada RB; Ayad M; Afyouni AS; Limfueco L; Nguyen N; Palma A; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2022 Apr; 36(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 34693735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.
Basulto-Martínez M; Proietti S; Pavia MP; Yeow Y; Eisner BH; Giusti G
Urolithiasis; 2023 Jan; 51(1):32. PubMed ID: 36648558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glossary of pre-settings given by laser companies: no consensus!
Sierra A; Corrales M; Piñero A; Kolvatzis M; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Sep; 40(9):2313-2321. PubMed ID: 35933626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.
Andreeva V; Vinarov A; Yaroslavsky I; Kovalenko A; Vybornov A; Rapoport L; Enikeev D; Sorokin N; Dymov A; Tsarichenko D; Glybochko P; Fried N; Traxer O; Altshuler G; Gapontsev V
World J Urol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):497-503. PubMed ID: 31055626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study.
Panthier F; Doizi S; Lapouge P; Chaussain C; Kogane N; Berthe L; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1683-1691. PubMed ID: 32253581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
Petzold R; Miernik A; Suarez-Ibarrola R
J Endourol; 2021 Feb; 35(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 32799650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers.
Ventimiglia E; Doizi S; Kovalenko A; Andreeva V; Traxer O
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):159-167. PubMed ID: 32277557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser.
Kraft L; Petzold R; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Miernik A
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 37(3):2071-2078. PubMed ID: 34905141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Thermal Injury and Laser Efficiency with Holmium YAG and Thulium Fiber Laser-An
Sierra A; Corrales M; Kolvatzis M; Panthier F; Piñero A; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2022 Dec; 36(12):1599-1606. PubMed ID: 35793107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser - What is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in vitro PEARLS study.
Kwok JL; Ventimiglia E; De Coninck V; Panthier F; Barghouthy Y; Danilovic A; Shrestha A; Smyth N; Schmid FA; Hunziker M; Poyet C; Daudon M; Traxer O; Eberli D; Keller EX
World J Urol; 2023 Dec; 41(12):3723-3730. PubMed ID: 37831156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dusting Efficiency of a Novel Pulsed Thulium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser
Kraft L; Yilmaz M; Petzold R; Gratzke C; Suarez-Ibarrola R; Miernik A
J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):259-265. PubMed ID: 34693738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Holmium laser for RIRS. Watts are we doing?
Basulto-Martínez M; Proietti S; Yeow Y; Rapallo I; Saitta G; Cimino S; Luciani L; Bellinzoni P; Gaboardi F; Giusti G
Arch Esp Urol; 2020 Oct; 73(8):735-744. PubMed ID: 33025918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
