These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37341535)

  • 1. Selection on the Fly: Short-Term Adaptation to an Altered Sexual Selection Regime in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Barata C; Snook RR; Ritchie MG; Kosiol C
    Genome Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 37341535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental evolution supports signatures of sexual selection in genomic divergence.
    Wiberg RAW; Veltsos P; Snook RR; Ritchie MG
    Evol Lett; 2021 Jun; 5(3):214-229. PubMed ID: 34136270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomics of Parallel Experimental Evolution in Drosophila.
    Graves JL; Hertweck KL; Phillips MA; Han MV; Cabral LG; Barter TT; Greer LF; Burke MK; Mueller LD; Rose MR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Apr; 34(4):831-842. PubMed ID: 28087779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental sexual selection affects the evolution of physiological and life-history traits.
    Garlovsky MD; Holman L; Brooks AL; Novicic ZK; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2022 May; 35(5):742-751. PubMed ID: 35384100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex-specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating.
    Veltsos P; Porcelli D; Fang Y; Cossins AR; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    Mol Ecol; 2022 Jun; 31(12):3374-3388. PubMed ID: 35437824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No selection for change in polyandry under experimental evolution.
    Sutter A; Travers LM; Weedon M; Oku K; Price TAR; Wedell N
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jul; 32(7):717-730. PubMed ID: 30970158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection on growth rate and local adaptation drive genomic adaptation during experimental range expansions in the protist Tetrahymena thermophila.
    Moerman F; Fronhofer EA; Altermatt F; Wagner A
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Jun; 91(6):1088-1103. PubMed ID: 34582573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic processes underlying rapid adaptation of a natural Chironomus riparius population to unintendedly applied experimental selection pressures.
    Pfenninger M; Foucault Q
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Feb; 29(3):536-548. PubMed ID: 31886913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila.
    Burke MK; Dunham JP; Shahrestani P; Thornton KR; Rose MR; Long AD
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):587-90. PubMed ID: 20844486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What paths do advantageous alleles take during short-term evolutionary change?
    Burke MK; Long AD
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Oct; 21(20):4913-6. PubMed ID: 23227489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection and experimental evolution of chemical signals in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Hunt J; Snook RR; Mitchell C; Crudgington HS; Moore AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2232-41. PubMed ID: 22984915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thermal adaptation in Drosophila serrata under conditions linked to its southern border: unexpected patterns from laboratory selection suggest limited evolutionary potential.
    Magiafoglou A; Hoffmann A
    J Genet; 2003 Dec; 82(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 15133194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive evolution of genes duplicated from the Drosophila pseudoobscura neo-X chromosome.
    Meisel RP; Hilldorfer BB; Koch JL; Lockton S; Schaeffer SW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1963-78. PubMed ID: 20351054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and interacting phenotypes in experimental evolution: a study of Drosophila pseudoobscura mating behavior.
    Bacigalupe LD; Crudgington HS; Slate J; Moore AJ; Snook RR
    Evolution; 2008 Jul; 62(7):1804-1812. PubMed ID: 18410532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genome-wide selection signatures reveal widespread synergistic effects of two different stressors in
    Burny C; Nolte V; Dolezal M; Schlötterer C
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Oct; 289(1985):20221857. PubMed ID: 36259211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast evolution from precast bricks: genomics of young freshwater populations of threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.
    Terekhanova NV; Logacheva MD; Penin AA; Neretina TV; Barmintseva AE; Bazykin GA; Kondrashov AS; Mugue NS
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Oct; 10(10):e1004696. PubMed ID: 25299485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Anderson WW
    Genome; 1989; 31(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 2687095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide analysis of long-term evolutionary domestication in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Phillips MA; Long AD; Greenspan ZS; Greer LF; Burke MK; Villeponteau B; Matsagas KC; Rizza CL; Mueller LD; Rose MR
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39281. PubMed ID: 28004838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection and the evolution of courtship song in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Snook RR; Robertson A; Crudgington HS; Ritchie MG
    Behav Genet; 2005 May; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15864440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.