These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37342056)

  • 1. Comparative Effectiveness of Percutaneous Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump or No Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.
    Almarzooq ZI; Song Y; Dahabreh IJ; Kochar A; Ferro EG; Secemsky EA; Major JM; Farb A; Wu C; Zuckerman B; Yeh RW
    JAMA Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 8(8):744-754. PubMed ID: 37342056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Nonacute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock.
    Watanabe A; Miyamoto Y; Ueyama H; Gotanda H; Tsugawa Y; Kuno T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2024 Jun; 13(11):e034645. PubMed ID: 38804220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical Outcomes and Cost Associated With an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Miller PE; Bromfield SG; Ma Q; Crawford G; Whitney J; DeVries A; Desai NR
    JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):926-933. PubMed ID: 35849410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trends in first-time hospitalization, management, and short-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock from 2005 to 2017: A nationwide cohort study.
    Lauridsen MD; Rørth R; Lindholm MG; Kjaergaard J; Schmidt M; Møller JE; Hassager C; Torp-Pedersen C; Gislason G; Køber L; Fosbøl EL
    Am Heart J; 2020 Nov; 229():127-137. PubMed ID: 32861678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.
    Cheng JM; den Uil CA; Hoeks SE; van der Ent M; Jewbali LS; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW
    Eur Heart J; 2009 Sep; 30(17):2102-8. PubMed ID: 19617601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device vs. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Hemodynamic Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock and Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Propensity-Matched Analysis'.
    Desai R; Hanna B; Singh S; Gupta S; Deshmukh A; Kumar G; Sachdeva R; Berman AE
    Am J Med Sci; 2021 Jan; 361(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 33008567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microaxial circulatory support for percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Leon SA; Rosen JL; Ahmad D; Austin MA; Vishnevsky A; Rajapreyar IN; Ruggiero NJ; Rame JE; Entwistle JW; Massey HT; Tchantchaleishvili V
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):934-942. PubMed ID: 36691820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
    Seyfarth M; Sibbing D; Bauer I; Fröhlich G; Bott-Flügel L; Byrne R; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Schömig A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost savings for pVAD compared to ECMO in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An episode-of-care analysis.
    Vetrovec GW; Lim MJ; Needham KA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Oct; 98(4):703-710. PubMed ID: 32790231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.
    Wang JI; Lu DY; Mhs ; Feldman DN; McCullough SA; Goyal P; Karas MG; Sobol I; Horn EM; Kim LK; Krishnan U
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Dec; 9(23):e017326. PubMed ID: 33222608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Unverzagt S; Buerke M; de Waha A; Haerting J; Pietzner D; Seyfarth M; Thiele H; Werdan K; Zeymer U; Prondzinsky R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 2015(3):CD007398. PubMed ID: 25812932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Escalation strategies, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock patients receiving percutaneous left ventricular support.
    Patlolla SH; Gilbert ON; Belford PM; Morris BN; Jentzer JC; Pisani BA; Applegate RJ; Zhao DX; Vallabhajosyula S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 37473420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Currently Available Options for Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.
    Wegermann ZK; Rao SV
    Cardiol Clin; 2020 Nov; 38(4):527-542. PubMed ID: 33036715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the British Columbia Cardiac Registry.
    Iqbal MB; Robinson SD; Ding L; Fung A; Aymong E; Chan AW; Hodge S; Della Siega A; Nadra IJ;
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148931. PubMed ID: 26870950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Bell MR; Sandhu GS; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Schears GJ; Stulak JM; Singh M; Gersh BJ; Jaffe AS; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e005929. PubMed ID: 31826642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.