These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37342632)

  • 1. Alternation preferences affect focus marking in German and English differently.
    Schauffler N
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1192004. PubMed ID: 37342632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction by Focus: Cleft Constructions and the Cross-Linguistic Variation in Phonological Form.
    Greif M; Skopeteas S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():648478. PubMed ID: 34912256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilingual children's social preferences hinge on accent.
    DeJesus JM; Hwang HG; Dautel JB; Kinzler KD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Dec; 164():178-191. PubMed ID: 28826060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic Correlates of Focus Marking in Czech and Polish.
    Hamlaoui F; Żygis M; Engelmann J; Wagner M
    Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):358-377. PubMed ID: 29781386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosodic Focus Marking in Silent Reading: Effects of Discourse Context and Rhythm.
    Kentner G; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():319. PubMed ID: 27014131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Truncating Are 'Truncating Languages'? Evidence from Russian and German.
    Rathcke TV
    Phonetica; 2016; 73(3-4):194-228. PubMed ID: 28208133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.
    Llanos F; German JS; Gnanateja GN; Chandrasekaran B
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 158():107883. PubMed ID: 33989647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Where does a 'foreign' accent matter? German, Spanish and Singaporean listeners' reactions to Dutch-accented English, and standard British and American English accents.
    Nejjari W; Gerritsen M; van Hout R; Planken B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231089. PubMed ID: 32348318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How experience with tone in the native language affects the L2 acquisition of pitch accents.
    Zahner-Ritter K; Zhao T; Einfeldt M; Braun B
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():903879. PubMed ID: 36059723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dynamics of intonation: Categorical and continuous variation in an attractor-based model.
    Roessig S; Mücke D; Grice M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216859. PubMed ID: 31120891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Focus Marking and Prosodic Boundary Strength in French.
    Michelas A; German JS
    Phonetica; 2020; 77(4):244-267. PubMed ID: 31261157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priming Effects of Focus in Mandarin Chinese.
    Yan M; Calhoun S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1985. PubMed ID: 31543850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acquisition of prosodic focus marking by English, French, and German three-, four-, five- and six-year-olds.
    Szendrői K; Bernard C; Berger F; Gervain J; Höhle B
    J Child Lang; 2018 Jan; 45(1):219-241. PubMed ID: 28462765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prosodic Disambiguation in First and Second Language Production: English and Korean.
    Baek H
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):598-624. PubMed ID: 34605716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.
    O'Brien MG; Jackson CN; Gardner CE
    Appl Psycholinguist; 2014 Jan; 35(1):27-70. PubMed ID: 24453383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prosodic Phrasing of Good Speakers in English and Czech.
    Skarnitzl R; Hledíková H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():857647. PubMed ID: 35401382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonological and phonetic marking of information status in Foreign Accent Syndrome.
    Kuschmann A; Lowit A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(6):738-49. PubMed ID: 23121531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist.
    Harris JA; Carlson K
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):480-512. PubMed ID: 29119869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accents, Not Just Prosodic Boundaries, Influence Syntactic Attachment.
    Carlson K; Tyler JC
    Lang Speech; 2018 Jun; 61(2):246-276. PubMed ID: 28686067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Focus, accent, and argument structure: effects on language comprehension.
    Birch S; Clifton C
    Lang Speech; 1995; 38 ( Pt 4)():365-91. PubMed ID: 8816086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.