These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 373427)
1. Sampling considerations in the gathering and analysis of pedigree data. Elston RC; Sobel E Am J Hum Genet; 1979 Jan; 31(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 373427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data. Boehnke M; Lange K Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework. Vieland VJ; Hodge SE Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of ascertainment-bias correction schemes for pedigrees ascertained through multiple probands. Majumder PP Stat Med; 1985; 4(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 4023475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait. Dawson DV; Elston RC Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correcting for nonrandom ascertainment in generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), fitted using Gibbs sampling. Burton PR Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 12508253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling considerations in the design and analysis of family studies. Elston RC; Bonney GE Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():349-71. PubMed ID: 6377317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: relatives of affected probands. Thompson EA Am J Hum Genet; 1981 Nov; 33(6):968-77. PubMed ID: 7325160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Planning of sampling for linkage analysis. Sample size and sampling method]. Aksenovich TI; Ginzburg EKh Genetika; 1993 Sep; 29(9):1544-53. PubMed ID: 8276222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset. Dawson DV Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A general unified framework to assess the sampling variance of heritability estimates using pedigree or marker-based relationships. Visscher PM; Goddard ME Genetics; 2015 Jan; 199(1):223-32. PubMed ID: 25361897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment. Boehnke M; Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: sequential schemes for sibships. Thompson EA Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 7272417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. III. Pedigrees. Shute NC; Ewens WJ Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Oct; 43(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 3177381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sampling strategies for the analysis of quantitative traits. Moll PP; Sing CF Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():307-42. PubMed ID: 392528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]