These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37343313)

  • 1. Monocular cues are superior to binocular cues for size perception when they are in conflict in virtual reality.
    Yoo SA; Lee S; Joo SJ
    Cortex; 2023 Sep; 166():80-90. PubMed ID: 37343313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cue-dependent effects of VR experience on motion-in-depth sensitivity.
    Fulvio JM; Ji M; Thompson L; Rosenberg A; Rokers B
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229929. PubMed ID: 32150569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Size-distance rescaling in the ensemble representation of range: Study with binocular and monocular cues.
    Markov YA; Tiurina NA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103238. PubMed ID: 33387867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stereopsis Only: Validation of a Monocular Depth Cues Reduced Gamified Virtual Reality with Reaction Time Measurement.
    Mehringer W; Wirth M; Roth D; Michelson G; Eskofier BM
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 May; 28(5):2114-2124. PubMed ID: 35167462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binocular coordination: reading stereoscopic sentences in depth.
    Schotter ER; Blythe HI; Kirkby JA; Rayner K; Holliman NS; Liversedge SP
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35608. PubMed ID: 22558174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the size-weight illusion with visuo-haptic conflict in immersive virtual reality.
    Buckingham G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2168-2175. PubMed ID: 30789088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiar size affects perception differently in virtual reality and the real world.
    Rzepka AM; Hussey KJ; Maltz MV; Babin K; Wilcox LM; Culham JC
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 378(1869):20210464. PubMed ID: 36511414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the retinal size of a peripheral cue on attentional orienting in two- and three-dimensional worlds.
    Jiang Y; Li S; Li Y; Zeng H; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1285-92. PubMed ID: 27007477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear perspective cues have a greater effect on the perceptual rescaling of distant stimuli than textures in the virtual environment.
    Yildiz GY; Skarbez R; Sperandio I; Chen SJ; Mulder IJ; Chouinard PA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):653-665. PubMed ID: 38182938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of perceptual cues in the trapezoid oscillatory illusion.
    Martinetti RF
    J Gen Psychol; 1975 Jan; 92(1st Half):129-35. PubMed ID: 1113085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension.
    Greenwald HS; Knill DC
    Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 18759994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.
    Thompson L; Ji M; Rokers B; Rosenberg A
    J Vis; 2019 Mar; 19(3):2. PubMed ID: 30836382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues.
    Harris JM; Watamaniuk SN
    Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):885-96. PubMed ID: 7762146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.
    Makino Y; Yano M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jan; 46(1-2):91-105. PubMed ID: 16271743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interocular transfer effects of linear perspective cues and texture gradients in the perceptual rescaling of size.
    Yildiz GY; Sperandio I; Kettle C; Chouinard PA
    Vision Res; 2021 Feb; 179():19-33. PubMed ID: 33276195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining binocular and monocular curvature features.
    Stevens KA; Lees M; Brookes A
    Perception; 1991; 20(4):425-40. PubMed ID: 1771128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further consideration of size illusions in random dot stereograms.
    Greene E; Gentner S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):205-12. PubMed ID: 11693687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infants' ability to respond to depth from the retinal size of human faces: comparing monocular and binocular preferential-looking.
    Tsuruhara A; Corrow S; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK; Yonas A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2014 Nov; 37(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25113916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review on various explanations of Ponzo-like illusions.
    Yildiz GY; Sperandio I; Kettle C; Chouinard PA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):293-320. PubMed ID: 34613601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.