334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3734348)
1. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases].
Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery.
Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F
Fertil Steril; 1986 Aug; 46(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 3732526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Microsurgical therapy in tubal sterility].
Fritzsche H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(21):1325-9. PubMed ID: 2278215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Microsurgical treatment of tubal infertility].
Breznik R; Borko E; Dolenec N
Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1985; 25(1-2):17-20. PubMed ID: 4087927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Distal lesions of the Fallopian tubes. Prognostic values of peroperative tubal biopsy].
Antoine JM; Salat-Baroux J; Merlier J; Valade S; Georges O; Feintuch MJ
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1985; 14(7):871-6. PubMed ID: 4093551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Microsurgical treatment of tuboperitoneal lesions. I. Results of distal tuboplasties: apropos of 135 cases].
Dubuisson JB; Aubriot FX; Barbot J; Henrion R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1985; 14(5):641-5. PubMed ID: 4067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsurgical salpingostomy is not an obsolete procedure.
Winston RM; Margara RA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):637-42. PubMed ID: 1832011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion.
Laatikainen TJ; Tenhunen AK; Venesmaa PK; Apter DL
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1988; 243(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 3401038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distal fallopian tube occlusion: false diagnosis with hysterosalpingography in cases of tubal diverticula.
Muzii L; Marana R; Mancuso S
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):469-71. PubMed ID: 8668796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Distal tubal surgery using laparoscopy].
Eyraud B; Erny R; Vergnet F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8463574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Possibilities and limits of endoscopic fallopian tube surgery].
Korell M; Strowitzki T; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(12):663-9. PubMed ID: 8585362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrosalpinx - Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion.
Ng KYB; Cheong Y
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():41-47. PubMed ID: 30824209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Usefulness and results of microsurgery in the treatment of female sterility].
Fioretti P; Teti G; Maffei S; Murru MS
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1990; 111(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 2088155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Distal tubal obstructions: microsurgery or in vitro fertilization].
Mage G; Pouly JL; Bouquet de Jolinière J; Chabrand S; Bruhat MA
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984; 13(8):933-7. PubMed ID: 6530526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between the American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions and distal tubal occlusion, salpingoscopy, and reproductive outcome in tubal surgery.
Marana R; Rizzi M; Muzii L; Catalano GF; Caruana P; Mancuso S
Fertil Steril; 1995 Nov; 64(5):924-9. PubMed ID: 7589635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Value of microsurgical operations of tubal-induced sterility--selection for extracorporeal fertilization].
Karbowski B; Schneider HP
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Nov; 46(11):825-8. PubMed ID: 3803879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of 232 consecutive tubal microsurgery cases.
Singhal V; Li TC; Cooke ID
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):628-36. PubMed ID: 1883785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infertility surgery: microsurgery.
Gomel V; Yarali H
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 4(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 1623151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective study of tubal mucosal lesions and fertility in hydrosalpinges.
Vasquez G; Boeckx W; Brosens I
Hum Reprod; 1995 May; 10(5):1075-8. PubMed ID: 7657744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
Letterie GS; Haggerty MF; Fellows DW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
