BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37347961)

  • 21. A multicenter random forest model for effective prognosis prediction in collaborative clinical research network.
    Li J; Tian Y; Zhu Y; Zhou T; Li J; Ding K; Li J
    Artif Intell Med; 2020 Mar; 103():101814. PubMed ID: 32143809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scaffold-Constrained Molecular Generation.
    Langevin M; Minoux H; Levesque M; Bianciotto M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):5637-5646. PubMed ID: 33301333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing Latent Distributions for Non-Adversarial Generative Networks.
    Guo T; Xu C; Shi B; Xu C; Tao D
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 May; 44(5):2657-2672. PubMed ID: 33301400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using in vitro ADME data for lead compound selection: An emphasis on PAMPA pH 5 permeability and oral bioavailability.
    Williams J; Siramshetty V; Nguyễn ÐT; Padilha EC; Kabir M; Yu KR; Wang AQ; Zhao T; Itkin M; Shinn P; Mathé EA; Xu X; Shah P
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2022 Feb; 56():116588. PubMed ID: 35030421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Experiments on Adversarial Examples for Deep Learning Model Using Multimodal Sensors.
    Kurniawan A; Ohsita Y; Murata M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the Pfizer Central Nervous System Multiparameter Optimization Calculator and a BBB Machine Learning Model.
    Urbina F; Zorn KM; Brunner D; Ekins S
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 12(12):2247-2253. PubMed ID: 34028255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
    Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Construction of Sports Training Performance Prediction Model Based on a Generative Adversarial Deep Neural Network Algorithm.
    Li G
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1211238. PubMed ID: 35637721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perturbation Theory/Machine Learning Model of ChEMBL Data for Dopamine Targets: Docking, Synthesis, and Assay of New l-Prolyl-l-leucyl-glycinamide Peptidomimetics.
    Ferreira da Costa J; Silva D; Caamaño O; Brea JM; Loza MI; Munteanu CR; Pazos A; García-Mera X; González-Díaz H
    ACS Chem Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 9(11):2572-2587. PubMed ID: 29791132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic-Quality Guided Wave Signals Synthesized Using Generative Adversarial Neural Networks.
    Heesch M; Dziendzikowski M; Mendrok K; Dworakowski Z
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Driven by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs).
    He C; Huang S; Cheng R; Tan KC; Jin Y
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2021 Jun; 51(6):3129-3142. PubMed ID: 32365041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In Silico Study of In Vitro GPCR Assays by QSAR Modeling.
    Mansouri K; Judson RS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1425():361-81. PubMed ID: 27311474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The power of deep learning to ligand-based novel drug discovery.
    Baskin II
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2020 Jul; 15(7):755-764. PubMed ID: 32228116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Discovering Highly Potent Molecules from an Initial Set of Inactives Using Iterative Screening.
    Cortés-Ciriano I; Firth NC; Bender A; Watson O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Sep; 58(9):2000-2014. PubMed ID: 30130102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?
    Anderson AB; Grazal CF; Balazs GC; Potter BK; Dickens JF; Forsberg JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jul; 478(7):0-1618. PubMed ID: 32282466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Development of Target-Specific Machine Learning Models as Scoring Functions for Docking-Based Target Prediction.
    Nogueira MS; Koch O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1238-1252. PubMed ID: 30802041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.