These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37348182)

  • 1. Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
    Le Bonniec A; Meade O; Fredrix M; Morrissey E; O'Carroll RE; Murphy PJ; Murphy AW; Mc Sharry J
    Soc Sci Med; 2023 Jul; 329():116022. PubMed ID: 37348182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
    Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.
    Hall NJ; Rubin GP; Dobson C; Weller D; Wardle J; Ritchie M; Rees CJ
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1645-57. PubMed ID: 24268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
    Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
    Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ambivalence and its influence on participation in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Oster C; Zajac I; Flight I; Hart E; Young GP; Wilson C; Turnbull D
    Qual Health Res; 2013 Sep; 23(9):1188-201. PubMed ID: 23917801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.
    Bradley DT; Treanor C; McMullan C; Owen T; Graham A; Anderson D
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008266. PubMed ID: 26353870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Daly C; Rabeneck L; Straus S; Baxter NN
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jun; 25(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 27197277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors related to longitudinal adherence in colorectal cancer screening: qualitative research findings.
    Benito L; Farre A; Binefa G; Vidal C; Cardona A; Pla M; García M
    Cancer Causes Control; 2018 Jan; 29(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 29170881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.
    Bertels L; Lucassen P; van Asselt K; Dekker E; van Weert H; Knottnerus B
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2020 Dec; 38(4):487-498. PubMed ID: 33185121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
    Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Barriers for Participation in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a Qualitative Study.
    Phillipsen S; Weltz LK; Dressler J; Nielsen MK; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN; Johnsen AT
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2023 Sep; 54(3):873-881. PubMed ID: 36301437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: a qualitative study.
    Clifton A; Burgess C; Clement S; Ohlsen R; Ramluggun P; Sturt J; Walters P; Barley EA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():257. PubMed ID: 27405348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
    van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.
    Bie AKL; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):262-271. PubMed ID: 30238859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening Intention Prediction of Colorectal Cancer among Urban Chinese Based on the Protection Motivation Theory.
    Wei W; Zhang M; Zuo D; Li Q; Zhang M; Chen X; Yu B; Liu Q
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy colorectal cancer screening in low uptake socio-demographic groups: A systematic review.
    Travis E; Ashley L; Pownall M; O'Connor DB
    Psychooncology; 2020 Aug; 29(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 32539187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attitudes and perceptions of people with a learning disability, family carers, and paid care workers towards cancer screening programmes in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.
    Byrnes K; Hamilton S; McGeechan GJ; O'Malley C; Mankelow J; Giles EL
    Psychooncology; 2020 Mar; 29(3):475-484. PubMed ID: 31834649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
    Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A qualitative investigation of factors influencing participation in bowel screening in New South Wales.
    Dawson G; Crane M; Lyons C; Burnham A; Bowman T; Travaglia J
    Health Promot J Austr; 2016 Apr; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26859797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facilitators and barriers to participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programme from the perspective of healthcare professionals: Qualitative research study.
    Unanue-Arza S; Portillo I; Idígoras I; Arostegui I; Arana-Arri E
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2021 Nov; 30(6):e13507. PubMed ID: 34462982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.