127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37348182)
1. Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies.
Le Bonniec A; Meade O; Fredrix M; Morrissey E; O'Carroll RE; Murphy PJ; Murphy AW; Mc Sharry J
Soc Sci Med; 2023 Jul; 329():116022. PubMed ID: 37348182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concerns, perceived need and competing priorities: a qualitative exploration of decision-making and non-participation in a population-based flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme to prevent colorectal cancer.
Hall N; Birt L; Rees CJ; Walter FM; Elliot S; Ritchie M; Weller D; Rubin G
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012304. PubMed ID: 27836872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attitudes and beliefs of non-participants in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.
Hall NJ; Rubin GP; Dobson C; Weller D; Wardle J; Ritchie M; Rees CJ
Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1645-57. PubMed ID: 24268129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ambivalence and its influence on participation in screening for colorectal cancer.
Oster C; Zajac I; Flight I; Hart E; Young GP; Wilson C; Turnbull D
Qual Health Res; 2013 Sep; 23(9):1188-201. PubMed ID: 23917801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.
Bradley DT; Treanor C; McMullan C; Owen T; Graham A; Anderson D
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008266. PubMed ID: 26353870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Daly C; Rabeneck L; Straus S; Baxter NN
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jun; 25(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 27197277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors related to longitudinal adherence in colorectal cancer screening: qualitative research findings.
Benito L; Farre A; Binefa G; Vidal C; Cardona A; Pla M; García M
Cancer Causes Control; 2018 Jan; 29(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 29170881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motives for non-adherence to colonoscopy advice after a positive colorectal cancer screening test result: a qualitative study.
Bertels L; Lucassen P; van Asselt K; Dekker E; van Weert H; Knottnerus B
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2020 Dec; 38(4):487-498. PubMed ID: 33185121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.
Toft EL; Kaae SE; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2019 Jun; 37(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 31079520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Barriers for Participation in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a Qualitative Study.
Phillipsen S; Weltz LK; Dressler J; Nielsen MK; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN; Johnsen AT
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2023 Sep; 54(3):873-881. PubMed ID: 36301437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: a qualitative study.
Clifton A; Burgess C; Clement S; Ohlsen R; Ramluggun P; Sturt J; Walters P; Barley EA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():257. PubMed ID: 27405348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy?
van Dam L; Korfage IJ; Kuipers EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; Reijerink JC; van Ballegooijen M; van Leerdam ME
Eur J Cancer; 2013 Jul; 49(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 23571149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.
Bie AKL; Brodersen J
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):262-271. PubMed ID: 30238859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening Intention Prediction of Colorectal Cancer among Urban Chinese Based on the Protection Motivation Theory.
Wei W; Zhang M; Zuo D; Li Q; Zhang M; Chen X; Yu B; Liu Q
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Barriers to flexible sigmoidoscopy colorectal cancer screening in low uptake socio-demographic groups: A systematic review.
Travis E; Ashley L; Pownall M; O'Connor DB
Psychooncology; 2020 Aug; 29(8):1237-1247. PubMed ID: 32539187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attitudes and perceptions of people with a learning disability, family carers, and paid care workers towards cancer screening programmes in the United Kingdom: A qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.
Byrnes K; Hamilton S; McGeechan GJ; O'Malley C; Mankelow J; Giles EL
Psychooncology; 2020 Mar; 29(3):475-484. PubMed ID: 31834649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
Eddy K; Jordan Z; Stephenson M
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):96-137. PubMed ID: 27532314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A qualitative investigation of factors influencing participation in bowel screening in New South Wales.
Dawson G; Crane M; Lyons C; Burnham A; Bowman T; Travaglia J
Health Promot J Austr; 2016 Apr; 27(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26859797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facilitators and barriers to participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programme from the perspective of healthcare professionals: Qualitative research study.
Unanue-Arza S; Portillo I; Idígoras I; Arostegui I; Arana-Arri E
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2021 Nov; 30(6):e13507. PubMed ID: 34462982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
