295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37348779)
1. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
Leon-Martinez D; Lundsberg LS; Culhane J; Zhang J; Son M; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Chao CR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38151220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dichorionic twin-specific vs singleton growth references for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction.
Shea SK; Likins BJ; Boan AD; Newman RB; Finneran MM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):603.e1-603.e9. PubMed ID: 33771495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Pineles BL; Mendez-Figueroa H; Chauhan SP
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Sep; 4(5):100672. PubMed ID: 35667554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standard for short-term neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Blue NR; Mele L; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Wapner RJ; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC;
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100599. PubMed ID: 35183799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mustafa HJ; Javinani A; Muralidharan V; Khalil A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jan; 6(1):101246. PubMed ID: 38072237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with "small" fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction.
Powel JE; Chavan NR; Zantow EW; Bialko MF; Farley LG; McCormick KM; Tomlinson TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):447.e1-447.e13. PubMed ID: 37767605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
Zhang-Rutledge K; Mack LM; Mastrobattista JM; Gandhi M
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of <5th vs 5th-9th percentile.
Mlynarczyk M; Chauhan SP; Baydoun HA; Wilkes CM; Earhart KR; Zhao Y; Goodier C; Chang E; Lee Plenty NM; Mize EK; Owens M; Babbar S; Maulik D; DeFranco E; McKinney D; Abuhamad AZ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):198.e1-198.e11. PubMed ID: 28433732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction.
Mascherpa M; Pegoire C; Meroni A; Minopoli M; Thilaganathan B; Frick A; Bhide A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 63(5):605-612. PubMed ID: 38145554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
Akolekar R; Ciobanu A; Zingler E; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):65.e1-65.e18. PubMed ID: 30878322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.
Sovio U; White IR; Dacey A; Pasupathy D; Smith GCS
Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10008):2089-2097. PubMed ID: 26360240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sonographic growth curves versus neonatal birthweight growth curves for the identification of fetal growth restriction.
Bergman M; Reichman O; Farkash R; Bin-Nun A; Samueloff A; Sapir AZ; Sela HY
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(23):4558-4565. PubMed ID: 33417530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile.
Blue NR; Savabi M; Beddow ME; Katukuri VR; Fritts CM; Izquierdo LA; Chao CR
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
