These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37348779)

  • 1. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
    Leon-Martinez D; Lundsberg LS; Culhane J; Zhang J; Son M; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
    Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Chao CR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 231(3):338.e1-338.e18. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dichorionic twin-specific vs singleton growth references for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction.
    Shea SK; Likins BJ; Boan AD; Newman RB; Finneran MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):603.e1-603.e9. PubMed ID: 33771495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis of fetal growth restriction in a cohort of small-for-gestational-age neonates at term: neonatal and maternal outcomes.
    Pineles BL; Mendez-Figueroa H; Chauhan SP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Sep; 4(5):100672. PubMed ID: 35667554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive performance of newborn small for gestational age by a United States intrauterine vs birthweight-derived standard for short-term neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    Blue NR; Mele L; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Wapner RJ; Thorp JM; Caritis SN; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Rouse DJ; Blackwell SC;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100599. PubMed ID: 35183799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic performance of 32 vs 36 weeks ultrasound in predicting late-onset fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mustafa HJ; Javinani A; Muralidharan V; Khalil A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Jan; 6(1):101246. PubMed ID: 38072237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with "small" fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction.
    Powel JE; Chavan NR; Zantow EW; Bialko MF; Farley LG; McCormick KM; Tomlinson TM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):447.e1-447.e13. PubMed ID: 37767605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
    Zhang-Rutledge K; Mack LM; Mastrobattista JM; Gandhi M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical significance of an estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile: a comparison of outcomes of <5th vs 5th-9th percentile.
    Mlynarczyk M; Chauhan SP; Baydoun HA; Wilkes CM; Earhart KR; Zhao Y; Goodier C; Chang E; Lee Plenty NM; Mize EK; Owens M; Babbar S; Maulik D; DeFranco E; McKinney D; Abuhamad AZ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):198.e1-198.e11. PubMed ID: 28433732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prenatal prediction of adverse outcome using different charts and definitions of fetal growth restriction.
    Mascherpa M; Pegoire C; Meroni A; Minopoli M; Thilaganathan B; Frick A; Bhide A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 63(5):605-612. PubMed ID: 38145554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine assessment of cerebroplacental ratio at 35-37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.
    Akolekar R; Ciobanu A; Zingler E; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):65.e1-65.e18. PubMed ID: 30878322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal Outcomes among Fetuses with an Abdominal Circumference <3rd %ile and Estimated Fetal Weight 3rd to 9th %ile Compared to Fetuses with an EFW <3rd %ile.
    Horgan R; Nehme L; Jensen HJ; Shah AP; Saal R; Onishi K; Kawakita T; Martins JG; Abuhamad A
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 Jul; 41(9):1120-1125. PubMed ID: 38301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.
    Sovio U; White IR; Dacey A; Pasupathy D; Smith GCS
    Lancet; 2015 Nov; 386(10008):2089-2097. PubMed ID: 26360240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
    Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
    Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonographic growth curves versus neonatal birthweight growth curves for the identification of fetal growth restriction.
    Bergman M; Reichman O; Farkash R; Bin-Nun A; Samueloff A; Sapir AZ; Sela HY
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(23):4558-4565. PubMed ID: 33417530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.