171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37350099)
1. Measurement Invariance in Longitudinal Bifactor Models: Review and Application Based on the
Neufeld SAS; St Clair M; Brodbeck J; Wilkinson PO; Goodyer IM; Jones PB
Assessment; 2024 Jun; 31(4):774-793. PubMed ID: 37350099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory: A Bifactor Model, Dimensionality, and Measurement Invariance.
Zwaanswijk W; Veen VC; Vedder P
Assessment; 2017 Oct; 24(7):932-944. PubMed ID: 26893389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.
Liu Y; Millsap RE; West SG; Tein JY; Tanaka R; Grimm KJ
Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):486-506. PubMed ID: 27213981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations.
Bornovalova MA; Choate AM; Fatimah H; Petersen KJ; Wiernik BM
Biol Psychiatry; 2020 Jul; 88(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 32199605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of bifactor models of dimensional psychopathology in youth.
Scopel Hoffmann M; Moore TM; Kvitko Axelrud L; Tottenham N; Zuo XN; Rohde LA; Milham MP; Satterthwaite TD; Salum GA
J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2022 May; 131(4):407-421. PubMed ID: 35511526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The General Psychopathology Factor: Structural Stability and Generalizability to Within-Individual Changes.
Gluschkoff K; Jokela M; Rosenström T
Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():594. PubMed ID: 31543833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Three recommendations based on a comparison of the reliability and validity of the predominant models used in research on the empirical structure of psychopathology.
Forbes MK; Greene AL; Levin-Aspenson HF; Watts AL; Hallquist M; Lahey BB; Markon KE; Patrick CJ; Tackett JL; Waldman ID; Wright AGC; Caspi A; Ivanova M; Kotov R; Samuel DB; Eaton NR; Krueger RF
J Abnorm Psychol; 2021 Apr; 130(3):297-317. PubMed ID: 33539117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Three recommendations based on a comparison of the reliability and validity of the predominant models used in research on the empirical structure of psychopathology": Correction to Forbes et al. (2021).
J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2022 Oct; 131(7):v. PubMed ID: 36222625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The German Version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10): Evaluation of Dimensionality, Validity, and Measurement Invariance With Exploratory and Confirmatory Bifactor Modeling.
Reis D; Lehr D; Heber E; Ebert DD
Assessment; 2019 Oct; 26(7):1246-1259. PubMed ID: 28627220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Criterion validity and relationships between alternative hierarchical dimensional models of general and specific psychopathology.
Moore TM; Kaczkurkin AN; Durham EL; Jeong HJ; McDowell MG; Dupont RM; Applegate B; Tackett JL; Cardenas-Iniguez C; Kardan O; Akcelik GN; Stier AJ; Rosenberg MD; Hedeker D; Berman MG; Lahey BB
J Abnorm Psychol; 2020 Oct; 129(7):677-688. PubMed ID: 32672986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the Meaning of the "
Heinrich M; Geiser C; Zagorscak P; Burns GL; Bohn J; Becker SP; Eid M; Beauchaine TP; Knaevelsrud C
Assessment; 2023 Apr; 30(3):487-507. PubMed ID: 34861784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretational issues with the bifactor model: a commentary on 'Defining the
Dolan CV; Borsboom D
Psychol Med; 2023 May; 53(7):2744-2747. PubMed ID: 37039112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the criterion validity of hierarchical psychopathology dimensions across models: Familial aggregation and associations with research domain criteria (sub)constructs.
Funkhouser CJ; Correa KA; Letkiewicz AM; Cozza EM; Estabrook R; Shankman SA
J Abnorm Psychol; 2021 Aug; 130(6):575-586. PubMed ID: 34553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longitudinal change of intrinsic capacity and associated factors in older Chinese adults: China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.
Yang F; Su Q; Ran Q; Hu Y
J Nutr Health Aging; 2024 May; 28(5):100214. PubMed ID: 38489991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.
Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 26514921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Invited Paper: The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models.
Reise SP
Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Sep; 47(5):667-696. PubMed ID: 24049214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.
Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 26523435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying bifactor modelling to improve the clinical interpretive values of Functional Independence Measure in adults with acquired brain injury.
Gao F; Foster M; Newcombe P; Geraghty T
Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 42(12):1753-1761. PubMed ID: 30499346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits: An Examination of a Bifactor Model and Measurement Invariance Between Those With and Without a Self-Reported Medical Condition.
Bardeen JR; Fergus TA
Assessment; 2020 Jan; 27(1):206-215. PubMed ID: 28800717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On top or underneath: where does the general factor of psychopathology fit within a dimensional model of psychopathology?
Hyland P; Murphy J; Shevlin M; Bentall RP; Karatzias T; Ho GWK; Boduszek D; McElroy E
Psychol Med; 2021 Oct; 51(14):2422-2432. PubMed ID: 32321608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
